Literature DB >> 15517409

Detecting predation and scavenging by DNA gut-content analysis: a case study using a soil insect predator-prey system.

Anita Juen1, Michael Traugott.   

Abstract

White grubs (larvae of Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) are abundant in below-ground systems and can cause considerable damage to a wide variety of crops by feeding on roots. White grub populations may be controlled by natural enemies, but the predator guild of the European species is barely known. Trophic interactions within soil food webs are difficult to study with conventional methods. Therefore, a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based approach was developed to investigate, for the first time, a soil insect predator-prey system. Can, however, highly sensitive detection methods identify carrion prey in predators, as has been shown for fresh prey? Fresh Melolontha melolontha (L.) larvae and 1- to 9-day-old carcasses were presented to Poecilus versicolor Sturm larvae. Mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I fragments of the prey, 175, 327 and 387 bp long, were detectable in 50% of the predators 32 h after feeding. Detectability decreased to 18% when a 585 bp sequence was amplified. Meal size and digestion capacity of individual predators had no influence on prey detection. Although prey consumption was negatively correlated with cadaver age, carrion prey could be detected by PCR as efficiently as fresh prey irrespective of carrion age. This is the first proof that PCR-based techniques are highly efficient and sensitive, both in fresh and carrion prey detection. Thus, if active predation has to be distinguished from scavenging, then additional approaches are needed to interpret the picture of prey choice derived by highly sensitive detection methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15517409     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-004-1736-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  20 in total

1.  Can multiple-copy sequences of prey DNA be detected amongst the gut contents of invertebrate predators?

Authors:  R H Zaidi; Z Jaal; N J Hawkes; J Hemingway; W O Symondson
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Collembola as alternative prey sustaining spiders in arable ecosystems: prey detection within predators using molecular markers.

Authors:  N Agustí; S P Shayler; J D Harwood; I P Vaughan; K D Sunderland; W O C Symondson
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Causes and consequences of biological diversity in soil.

Authors:  Richard D Bardgett
Journal:  Zoology (Jena)       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Preparation and purification of DNA from insects for AFLP analysis.

Authors:  A Reineke; P Karlovsky; C P Zebitz
Journal:  Insect Mol Biol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.585

5.  PCR-based gut content analysis of insect predators: using ribosomal ITS-1 fragments from prey to estimate predation frequency.

Authors:  M Hoogendoorn; G E Heimpel
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Do earthworms help to sustain the slug predator Pterostichus melanarius (Coleoptera: carabidae) within crops? Investigations using monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  W O Symondson; D M Glen; M L Erickson; J E Liddell; C J Langdon
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Development of sequence amplified characterized region (SCAR) markers of helicoverpa armigera: a new polymerase chain reaction-based technique for predator gut analysis

Authors: 
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  Assessment of parasitism of house fly and stable fly (Diptera: Muscidae) pupae by pteromalid (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) parasitoids using a polymerase chain reaction assay.

Authors:  Susan T Ratcliffe; Hugh M Robertson; Carl J Jones; German A Bollero; Richard A Weinzierl
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.278

9.  The soil food web of two beech forests (Fagus sylvatica) of contrasting humus type: stable isotope analysis of a macro- and a mesofauna-dominated community.

Authors:  S Scheu; M Falca
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Detecting Cacopsylla pyricola (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in predator guts using COI mitochondrial markers.

Authors:  Nuria Agustí; T R Unruh; S C Welter
Journal:  Bull Entomol Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.750

View more
  20 in total

1.  Testing prey DNA fingerprinting on Amblyseius largoensis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) predation of Raoiella indica (Acari: Tenuipalpidae).

Authors:  Carlos Rivera-Rivera; Alberto Galindo-Cardona; Jose Carlos Verle Rodrigues
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 2.132

2.  Removal of free extracellular DNA from environmental samples by ethidium monoazide and propidium monoazide.

Authors:  Andreas O Wagner; Cornelia Malin; Brigitte A Knapp; Paul Illmer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Evidence of Amblyseius largoensis and Euseius alatus as biological control agent of Aceria guerreronis.

Authors:  J W S Melo; D B Lima; H Staudacher; F R Silva; M G C Gondim; M W Sabelis
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 2.132

4.  Identifying the predator complex of Homalodisca vitripennis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae): a comparative study of the efficacy of an ELISA and PCR gut content assay.

Authors:  Valerie Fournier; James Hagler; Kent Daane; Jesse de León; Russell Groves
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Diversity and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enterica isolates from surface water in Southeastern United States.

Authors:  Baoguang Li; George Vellidis; Huanli Liu; Michele Jay-Russell; Shaohua Zhao; Zonglin Hu; Anita Wright; Christopher A Elkins
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  The effect of plant identity and the level of plant decay on molecular gut content analysis in a herbivorous soil insect.

Authors:  Corinna Wallinger; Karin Staudacher; Nikolaus Schallhart; Eva Peter; Philipp Dresch; Anita Juen; Michael Traugott
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 7.090

7.  Detecting ingested plant DNA in soil-living insect larvae.

Authors:  Karin Staudacher; Corinna Wallinger; Nikolaus Schallhart; Michael Traugott
Journal:  Soil Biol Biochem       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.609

8.  Intraguild predation and native lady beetle decline.

Authors:  Mary M Gardiner; Matthew E O'Neal; Douglas A Landis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Optimizing methods for PCR-based analysis of predation.

Authors:  Daniela Sint; Lorna Raso; Rüdiger Kaufmann; Michael Traugott
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 7.090

10.  Detection of predation using qPCR: effect of prey quantity, elapsed time, chaser diet, and sample preservation on detectable quantity of prey DNA.

Authors:  Donald C Weber; Jonathan G Lundgren
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.