Literature DB >> 15517237

The gold standard: PACS alchemy and the gold standard.

Kenneth Burgess1, Thomas L Slovis.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15517237     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-004-1296-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Interpretation of Emergency Department radiographs: a comparison of emergency medicine physicians with radiologists, residents with faculty, and film with digital display.

Authors:  J Eng; W K Mysko; G E Weller; R Renard; J N Gitlin; D A Bluemke; D Magid; G D Kelen; W W Scott
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Image quality and dose comparison among screen-film, computed, and CT scanned projection radiography: applications to CT urography.

Authors:  C H McCollough; M R Bruesewitz; T J Vrtiska; B F King; A J LeRoy; J P Quam; R R Hattery
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  An experimental comparison of detector performance for computed radiography systems.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Michael J Flynn
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  High-volume teleradiology service: focus on radiologist satisfaction.

Authors:  Elizabeth Krupinski; Kevin McNeill; Kai Haber; Theron Ovitt
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Comparison of a PACS workstation with conventional film for interpretation of neonatal examinations: a paired comparison study.

Authors:  E A Franken; W L Smith; K S Berbaum; S C Kao; Y Sato
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1991

6.  Computed radiography and film digitizer inputs to an intensive care unit teleradiology system: an image quality comparison.

Authors:  W Huda; J C Honeyman; C K Palmer; M M Frost; E V Staab
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.173

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.