Literature DB >> 15517185

Influence of fracture history and bone mineral density testing on the treatment of osteoporosis in two non-academic community centers.

Meagan E Hamel1, Rolf J Sebaldt, Kerry Siminoski, Jonathan D Adachi, Emmanuel Papadimitropoulos, Annie Petrie, Charles H Goldsmith.   

Abstract

A history of fracture and a low bone mineral density (BMD) are the strongest predictors of future osteoporotic fracture. This prospective cohort study assessed the impact of these two factors on treatment patterns in women undergoing their first BMD testing in a non-academic community setting. Successive women seen for first BMD testing at two testing centers completed a baseline questionnaire and a mailed 3-month follow-up questionnaire. Patients were grouped by history of fracture after age 20 years (present, absent) and by BMD result [osteoporosis (OP), osteopenia (OPN), normal BMD]. Thirty percent of 1144 patients at least 45 years old reported a history of fracture after age 20 years. They were no more likely than those without a history of fracture to be taking calcium (52% of total), vitamin D (31%), estrogen (31%), or a bisphosphonate (2%) before BMD testing. The BMD testing revealed OP in 20%, OPN in 45%, and normal BMD in 35%. Three months later, the percentages of patients taking treatments differed as follows: calcium (66 vs 53% in OP and OPN groups vs normal BMD), vitamin D (46 vs 37% in OPN group vs normal BMD), estrogen (25 vs 36 vs 44% in groups with OP, OPN, and normal BMD), a bisphosphonate (43 vs 11 vs 1%), and at least one of estrogen or a bisphosphonate (58 vs 43 vs 46%). Treatment decisions were influenced by first BMD testing but not significantly by a history of fracture. There is a substantial care gap in the treatment of patients with OP: either bisphosphonate or estrogen therapy was taken by only 31% of patients at least 45 years old and with a history of fracture after age 20 years before BMD testing and by only 58% of these and who also had OP by BMD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15517185     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-004-1776-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  19 in total

1.  Interim report and recommendations of the World Health Organization Task-Force for Osteoporosis.

Authors:  H K Genant; C Cooper; G Poor; I Reid; G Ehrlich; J Kanis; B E Nordin; E Barrett-Connor; D Black; J P Bonjour; B Dawson-Hughes; P D Delmas; J Dequeker; S Ragi Eis; C Gennari; O Johnell; C C Johnston; E M Lau; U A Liberman; R Lindsay; T J Martin; B Masri; C A Mautalen; P J Meunier; N Khaltaev
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Questionnaire about calcium intake: can we trust the answers?

Authors:  M Angbratt; M Möller
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Bone mineral density testing and osteoporosis education improve lifestyle behaviors in premenopausal women: a prospective study.

Authors:  S A Jamal; R Ridout; C Chase; L Fielding; L A Rubin; G A Hawker
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Results of bone densitometry affect women's decisions about taking measures to prevent fractures.

Authors:  S M Rubin; S R Cummings
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  What is the impact of osteoporosis education and bone mineral density testing for postmenopausal women in a managed care setting?

Authors:  S J Rolnick; R Kopher; J Jackson; L R Fischer; R Compo
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Awareness of osteoporosis and compliance with management guidelines in patients with newly diagnosed low-impact fractures.

Authors:  H Castel; D Y Bonneh; M Sherf; Y Liel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Osteoporosis management in long-term care. Survey of Ontario physicians.

Authors:  H G McKercher; R G Crilly; M Kloseck
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Physician characteristics associated with the use of bone densitometry.

Authors:  L J Papa; B E Weber
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture.

Authors:  R Lindsay; S L Silverman; C Cooper; D A Hanley; I Barton; S B Broy; A Licata; L Benhamou; P Geusens; K Flowers; H Stracke; E Seeman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-01-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Prevention and management of osteoporosis: consensus statements from the Scientific Advisory Board of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada. 2. The use of bone density measurement in the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  W Sturtridge; B Lentle; D A Hanley
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  9 in total

1.  Development of an electronic medical record based intervention to improve medical care of osteoporosis.

Authors:  B J Edwards; A D Bunta; J Anderson; A Bobb; A Hahr; K J O'Leary; A Agulnek; L Andruszyn; K A Cameron; M May; N H Kazmers; N Dillon; D W Baker; M V Williams
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Increased serum osteopontin is a risk factor for osteoporosis in menopausal women.

Authors:  I-C Chang; T-I Chiang; K-T Yeh; H Lee; Y-W Cheng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Age and drug therapy are key prognostic factors for first clinical fracture in patients with primary osteoporosis.

Authors:  O Gajic-Veljanoski; R J Sebaldt; A M Davis; D Tritchler; G Tomlinson; A Petrie; J D Adachi; A M Cheung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Utilization of DXA Bone Mineral Densitometry in Ontario: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-11-01

5.  Direct-to-participant feedback and awareness of bone mineral density testing results in a population-based sample of mid-aged Canadians.

Authors:  E Kingwell; J C Prior; P A Ratner; S M Kennedy
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Postfracture care for older women: gaps between optimal care and actual care.

Authors:  Colleen J Metge; William D Leslie; Lori-Jean Manness; Marina Yogendran; C K Yuen; Brent Kvern
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Closing the osteoporosis care gap: increased osteoporosis awareness among geriatrics and rehabilitation teams.

Authors:  Derek A Haaland; Dana R Cohen; Courtney C Kennedy; Nader A Khalidi; Jonathan D Adachi; Alexandra Papaioannou
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 3.921

8.  Characteristics associated with anti-osteoporosis medication use: data from the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW) USA cohort.

Authors:  Pamela Guggina; Julie Flahive; Frederick H Hooven; Nelson B Watts; Ethel S Siris; Stuart Silverman; Christian Roux; Johannes Pfeilschifter; Susan L Greenspan; Adolfo Díez-Pérez; Cyrus Cooper; Juliet E Compston; Roland Chapurlat; Steven Boonen; Jonathan D Adachi; Frederick A Anderson; Stephen Gehlbach
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Patterns of anti-osteoporosis medication use among women at high risk of fracture: findings from the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW).

Authors:  Stephen Gehlbach; Frederick H Hooven; Allison Wyman; Adolfo Diez-Perez; Jonathan D Adachi; Xuemei Luo; Andrew G Bushmakin; Frederick A Anderson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.