Literature DB >> 15515202

Comparison of femoral geometry among cases with and without hip fractures.

Havva Talay Calis1, Merih Eryavuz, Mustafa Calis.   

Abstract

Hip fractures have high morbidity and mortality rate for the people as a complication of osteoporosis and is generally seen in old age. It is known that femoral geometric measurements are important in the assessment of hip fracture risks. This study aimed to examine the association between hip geometry and hip fracture in post-menopausal elderly females. In the present study, 232 hip X-rays were taken from women with no hip fractures (Group 1) and 29 post-menopausal women with hip fractures (Group 2) after a minor trauma. After standard anterior-posterior plain pelvic X-ray radiographs were obtained, various radiographic measurements were performed in all cases, including the hip axis length (HAL), femoral neck axis length (FAL), acetabular width (AW), femoral head width (HW), femoral neck width (FW), femoral shaft width (FSW), intertrochanteric width (TW), lateral and medial cortical thickness of the femoral shaft (LCT, SMCT), femoral neck cortical thickness (NMCT) and femoral neck-shaft angle (Q-angle). In group 1, the mean age, weight and height were 62.5 +/- 7.4 years, 70.8 +/- 12.5 kg, and 157.5 +/- 6.7 cm, respectively. In group 2, these values were 70.17 +/- 6.8 years, 64.7 +/- 11.5 kg, and 158.3 +/- 2.7 cm, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the measurements of HAL, FAL, AW and HW between the two groups. In group 2, the mean FW value was significantly higher than in group 1 (p= 0.01). The mean values for FSW, TW, NMCT, SMCT, LCT were statistically lower in group 2 than those in group 1 (p= 0.01, p=0.038, p=0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). Q-angle was also significantly higher in cases with hip fracture than in cases with no hip fracture (p=0.01). The values of FW, FSW, TW, NMCT, SMCT, LCT and Q-angle seem to be important parameters in the evaluation of hip fracture risks. However, further studies are needed to clarify this conclusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15515202     DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2004.45.5.901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yonsei Med J        ISSN: 0513-5796            Impact factor:   2.759


  9 in total

Review 1.  Bone geometry and skeletal fragility.

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein; David Karasik
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  Morphometry of Proximal Femur in Indian Population.

Authors:  Minakshi Verma; Sheetal Joshi; Anita Tuli; Shashi Raheja; Priyanka Jain; Priyanka Srivastava
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-02-01

3.  Estimation of Total Length of Femur from its Proximal and Distal Segmental Measurements of Disarticulated Femur Bones of Nepalese Population using Regression Equation Method.

Authors:  Laxman Khanal; Sandip Shah; Sarun Koirala
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-03-01

4.  Evaluation of compressive strength index of the femoral neck in Caucasians and chinese.

Authors:  Na Yu; Yong-Jun Liu; Yufang Pei; Lei Zhang; Shufeng Lei; Niraj R Kothari; Ding-You Li; Christopher J Papasian; James Hamilton; Ji-Qun Cai; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Ethnic differences in composite indices of femoral neck strength.

Authors:  S Ishii; J A Cauley; G A Greendale; M E Danielson; N Safaei Nili; A Karlamangla
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Structural determinants of hip fracture in elderly women: re-analysis of the data from the EPIDOS study.

Authors:  P Szulc; F Duboeuf; A M Schott; P Dargent-Molina; P J Meunier; P D Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  A biomechanical sorting of clinical risk factors affecting osteoporotic hip fracture.

Authors:  Y Luo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Anthropometric analysis of the hip joint in South Indian population using computed tomography.

Authors:  Vetrivel Chezian Sengodan; Elangovan Sinmayanantham; J Saravana Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  Anatomical axes of the proximal and distal halves of the femur in a normally aligned healthy population: implications for surgery.

Authors:  Hamidreza Yazdi; Ara Nazarian; John Y Kwon; Mary G Hochman; Reza Pakdaman; Poopak Hafezi; Morteza Ghahremani; Samad Joudi; Mohammad Ghorbanhoseini
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.359

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.