Literature DB >> 15509067

Lutetium oxyorthosilicate block detector readout by avalanche photodiode arrays for high resolution animal PET.

B J Pichler1, B K Swann, J Rochelle, R E Nutt, S R Cherry, S B Siegel.   

Abstract

Avalanche photodiodes (APDs) have proven to be useful as light detectors for high resolution positron emission tomography (PET). Their compactness makes these devices excellent candidates for replacing bulky photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) in PET systems where space limitations are an issue. The readout of densely packed, 10 x 10 lutetium oxyorthosilicate (LSO) block detectors (crystal size 2.0 x 2.0 x 12 mm3) with custom-built monolithic 3 x 3 APD arrays was investigated. The APDs had a 5 x 5 mm2 active surface and were arranged on a 6.25 mm pitch. The dead space on the edges of the array was 1.25 mm. The APDs were operated at a bias voltage of approximately 380 V for a gain of 100 and a dark current of 10 nA per APD. The standard deviation in gain between the APDs in the array ranged from 1.8 to 6.5% as the gain was varied from 50 to 108. A fast, low-noise, multi-channel charge sensitive preamplifier application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) was developed for the APD readout. The amplifier had a rise time of 8 ns, a noise floor of 515 e- rms and a 9 e- pF(-1) noise slope. An acquired flood image showed that all 100 crystals from the block detector could be resolved. Timing measurements with single-channel LSO-APD detectors, as well as with the array, against a plastic scintillator and PMT assembly showed a time resolution of 1.2 ns and 2.5 ns, respectively. The energy resolution measured with a single 4.0 x 4.0 x 10 mm3 LSO crystal, wrapped in four-layer polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tape and coupled with optical grease on a single APD of the array, yielded 15% (full width at half maximum, FWHM) at 511 keV. Stability tests over 9 months of operation showed that the APD arrays do not degrade appreciably. These results demonstrate the ability to decode densely packed LSO scintillation blocks with compact APD arrays. The good timing and energy resolution makes these detectors suitable for high resolution PET.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15509067     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/49/18/008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  14 in total

Review 1.  PET/MRI hybrid imaging: devices and initial results.

Authors:  Bernd J Pichler; Martin S Judenhofer; Hans F Wehrl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Novel detector technology for clinical PET.

Authors:  Roger Lecomte
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  PET/MRI system design.

Authors:  Gaspar Delso; Sibylle Ziegler
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Pre-clinical PET/MR: technological advances and new perspectives in biomedical research.

Authors:  Hans F Wehrl; Martin S Judenhofer; Stefan Wiehr; Bernd J Pichler
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging: the next generation of multimodality imaging?

Authors:  Bernd J Pichler; Hans F Wehrl; Armin Kolb; Martin S Judenhofer
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.446

6.  PET imaging in pediatric neuroradiology: current and future applications.

Authors:  Sunhee Kim; Noriko Salamon; Hollie A Jackson; Stefan Blüml; Ashok Panigrahy
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-11-24

Review 7.  Advances in PET/MR instrumentation and image reconstruction.

Authors:  Jorge Cabello; Sibylle I Ziegler
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  A sub-millimeter resolution PET detector module using a multi-pixel photon counter array.

Authors:  Tae Yong Song; Heyu Wu; Sergey Komarov; Stefan B Siegel; Yuan-Chuan Tai
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 9.  Multimodality imaging: an update on PET/CT technology.

Authors:  Osama Mawlawi; David W Townsend
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  Clinical applications of PET/MRI: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Felix Nensa; Karsten Beiderwellen; Philipp Heusch; Axel Wetter
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.630

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.