Literature DB >> 11751806

Handheld computer use in U.S. family practice residency programs.

Dan F Criswell1, Michael L Parchman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the uses of handheld computers (also called personal digital assistants, or PDAs) in family practice residency programs in the United States. STUDY
DESIGN: In November 2000, the authors mailed a questionnaire to the program directors of all American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) and American College of Osteopathic Family Practice (ACOFP) residency programs in the United States. MEASUREMENTS: Data and patterns of the use and non-use of handheld computers were identified.
RESULTS: Approximately 50 percent (306 of 610) of the programs responded to the survey. Two thirds of the programs reported that handheld computers were used in their residencies, and an additional 14 percent had plans for implementation within 24 months. Both the Palm and the Windows CE operating systems were used, with the Palm operating system the most common. Military programs had the highest rate of use (8 of 10 programs, 80 percent), and osteopathic programs had the lowest (23 of 55 programs, 42 percent). Of programs that reported handheld computer use, 45 percent had required handheld computer applications that are used uniformly by all users. Funding for handheld computers and related applications was non-budgeted in 76percent of the programs in which handheld computers were used. In programs providing a budget for handheld computers, the average annual budget per user was 461.58 dollars. Interested faculty or residents, rather than computer information services personnel, performed upkeep and maintenance of handheld computers in 72 percent of the programs in which the computers are used. In addition to the installed calendar, memo pad, and address book, the most common clinical uses of handheld computers in the programs were as medication reference tools, electronic textbooks, and clinical computational or calculator-type programs.
CONCLUSIONS: Handheld computers are widely used in family practice residency programs in the United States. Although handheld computers were designed as electronic organizers, in family practice residencies they are used as medication reference tools, electronic textbooks, and clinical computational programs and to track activities that were previously associated with desktop database applications.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11751806      PMCID: PMC349390          DOI: 10.1136/jamia.2002.0090080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  12 in total

1.  Using handheld computers to document family practice resident procedure experience.

Authors:  R Garvin; F Otto; D McRae
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Information in the palm of your hand.

Authors:  M Ebell; D Rovner
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 0.493

3.  Know your needs, pick a device to fit.

Authors:  N Chesanow
Journal:  Med Econ       Date:  2000-10-23

4.  Your ticket to fast, flawless prescribing.

Authors:  N Chesanow
Journal:  Med Econ       Date:  2000-10-23

5.  Implementation and termination of a computerized medical information system.

Authors:  F Lawler; J R Cacy; N Viviani; R M Hamm; S W Cobb
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 0.493

6.  Family practice educators' perceptions of computer-based patient records.

Authors:  C Musham; S M Ornstein; R G Jenkins
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  Recent implementations of electronic medical records in four family practice residency programs.

Authors:  T Swanson; J Dostal; B Eichhorst; C Jernigan; M Knox; K Roper
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  Electronic medical records in family practice: the time is now.

Authors:  S M Ornstein
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 0.493

9.  New connections between medical knowledge and patient care.

Authors:  L L Weed
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-07-26

10.  Information needs in office practice: are they being met?

Authors:  D G Covell; G C Uman; P R Manning
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Handheld computing in medicine.

Authors:  Sandra Fischer; Thomas E Stewart; Sangeeta Mehta; Randy Wax; Stephen E Lapinsky
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  "Palm reading": 1. Handheld hardware and operating systems.

Authors:  Feisal A Adatia; Philippe L Bedard
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Understanding usage patterns of handheld computers in clinical practice.

Authors:  Mathias Tschopp; Christian Lovis; Antoine Geissbuhler
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

4.  Why don't physicians use their personal digital assistants?

Authors:  Yen-Chiao Lu; Jin Kyung Lee; Yan Xiao; Andrew Sears; Jacko A Jacko; Kathleen Charters
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

5.  Survey assessment of personal digital assistant use among trainees and attending physicians.

Authors:  Thomas G McLeod; Jon O Ebbert; James F Lymp
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-08-04       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  The use of personal digital assistants in the health sciences: results of a survey.

Authors:  Sandra L De Groote; Marceline Doranski
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2004-07

Review 7.  A review on diffusion of personal digital assistants in healthcare.

Authors:  Craig E Kuziemsky; Francis Laul; Raymond C Leung
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  Development and testing of a scale to assess physician attitudes about handheld computers with decision support.

Authors:  Midge N Ray; Thomas K Houston; Feliciano B Yu; Nir Menachemi; Richard S Maisiak; Jeroan J Allison; Eta S Berner
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 9.  Use of handheld computers in medical education. A systematic review.

Authors:  Anna Kho; Laura E Henderson; Daniel D Dressler; Sunil Kripalani
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 10.  Basic microbiologic and infection control information to reduce the potential transmission of pathogens to patients via computer hardware.

Authors:  Alice N Neely; Dean F Sittig
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.