Literature DB >> 15494359

A linguistic framework for assessing the quality of written patient information: its use in assessing methotrexate information for rheumatoid arthritis.

Rosemary Clerehan1, Rachelle Buchbinder, Jane Moodie.   

Abstract

Patient information leaflets are an important adjunct to verbal exchange between doctor and patient. Their value is dependent upon whether they contain useful information from the viewpoint of the patient and are easily understood. We developed a framework based upon linguistic theory for assessing the quality of written patient information and applied it to a set of leaflets about methotrexate treatment. Items included the overall structure of the text, the technicality of the vocabulary used, the number of content words per clause ('lexical density'), and the clarity of the role relationship between author and reader. The leaflets consisted of up to nine identifiable sections (range 3-8): background information about the drug, summary of its use, dosage instructions, outline of benefits and side-effects, monitoring information, constraints on patient behavior, storage instructions, and clinical contact availability. Most leaflets contained a high number of content words per clause and the identity of the author was clear in only three (17%). Linguistic analysis provides highly relevant information about written patient information. Together with critical assessment of factual and visual aspects, consideration of key linguistic features should improve the quality of informational texts for our patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15494359     DOI: 10.1093/her/cyg123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Res        ISSN: 0268-1153


  20 in total

1.  The contents of dental implant patient information leaflets available within the UK.

Authors:  J Barber; J Puryer; L McNally; D O'Sullivan
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Readability and Comprehension of the Geriatric Depression Scale and PROMIS® Physical Function Items in Older African Americans and Latinos.

Authors:  Sylvia H Paz; Loretta Jones; José L Calderón; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 3.  Toward Ensuring Health Equity: Readability and Cultural Equivalence of OMERACT Patient-reported Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Jennifer Petkovic; Jonathan Epstein; Rachelle Buchbinder; Vivian Welch; Tamara Rader; Anne Lyddiatt; Rosemary Clerehan; Robin Christensen; Annelies Boonen; Niti Goel; Lara J Maxwell; Karine Toupin-April; Maarten De Wit; Jennifer Barton; Caroline Flurey; Janet Jull; Cheryl Barnabe; Antoine G Sreih; Willemina Campbell; Christoph Pohl; Mehmet Tuncay Duruöz; Jasvinder A Singh; Peter S Tugwell; Francis Guillemin
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 4.666

4.  Informed choice in bowel cancer screening: a qualitative study to explore how adults with lower education use decision aids.

Authors:  Sian K Smith; Paul Kearney; Lyndal Trevena; Alexandra Barratt; Don Nutbeam; Kirsten J McCaffery
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Enabling cross-cultural data pooling in trials: linguistic validation of head and neck cancer measures for Indian patients.

Authors:  Chindhu Shunmugasundaram; Haryana M Dhillon; Phyllis N Butow; Puma Sundaresan; Claudia Rutherford
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Cancer-related cognitive impairment: a mixed methods evaluation of a standard factsheet.

Authors:  Chloe Yi Shing Lim; Sharon He; Joanne Shaw; Haryana M Dhillon
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Consumer's Perception on Design and Layout of Consumer Medical Information Leaflets on Obesity and Lipid Lowering Drugs.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Mathew; Kingston Rajiah; Krishana Kumar Sharma
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-12-15

8.  Development and Pilot Testing of a Decision Aid for Genomic Research Participants Notified of Clinically Actionable Research Findings for Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Amanda M Willis; Sian K Smith; Bettina Meiser; Mandy L Ballinger; David M Thomas; Martin Tattersall; Mary-Anne Young
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Information needs and preferences of low and high literacy consumers for decisions about colorectal cancer screening: utilizing a linguistic model.

Authors:  Sian K Smith; Lyndal Trevena; Don Nutbeam; Alexandra Barratt; Kirsten J McCaffery
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Development and pilot testing of a leaflet informing women with breast cancer about genomic testing for polygenic risk.

Authors:  Rajneesh Kaur; Bettina Meiser; Tatiane Yanes; Mary-Anne Young; Kristine Barlow-Stewart; Tony Roscioli; Sian Smith; Paul A James
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.