Literature DB >> 15490426

Adjusting the generalized ROC curve for covariates.

Enrique F Schisterman1, David Faraggi, Benjamin Reiser.   

Abstract

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and in particular the area under the curve (AUC), are widely used to examine the effectiveness of diagnostic markers. Diagnostic markers and their corresponding ROC curves can be strongly influenced by covariate variables. When several diagnostic markers are available, they can be combined by a best linear combination such that the area under the ROC curve of the combination is maximized among all possible linear combinations. In this paper we discuss covariate effects on this linear combination assuming that the multiple markers, possibly transformed, follow a multivariate normal distribution. The ROC curve of this linear combination when markers are adjusted for covariates is estimated and approximate confidence intervals for the corresponding AUC are derived. An example of two biomarkers of coronary heart disease for which covariate information on age and gender is available is used to illustrate this methodology. 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15490426     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  12 in total

1.  Parametric and non-parametric confidence intervals of the probability of identifying early disease stage given sensitivity to full disease and specificity with three ordinal diagnostic groups.

Authors:  Tuochuan Dong; Lili Tian; Alan Hutson; Chengjie Xiong
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  The inconsistency of "optimal" cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Authors:  Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Lehmann family of ROC curves.

Authors:  Mithat Gönen; Glenn Heller
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Estimating covariate-adjusted measures of diagnostic accuracy based on pooled biomarker assessments.

Authors:  Christopher S McMahan; Alexander C McLain; Colin M Gallagher; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 2.207

5.  Histidine decarboxylase is identified as a potential biomarker of intestinal mucosal injury in patients with acute intestinal obstruction.

Authors:  Jian-Jun Yang; Yan-Lei Ma; Peng Zhang; Hong-Qi Chen; Zhi-Hua Liu; Huan-Long Qin
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 6.354

6.  Evaluating the improvement in diagnostic utility from adding new predictors.

Authors:  Caixia Li; Ying Lu
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.207

7.  Combining multiple continuous tests for the diagnosis of kidney impairment in the absence of a gold standard.

Authors:  Binbing Yu; Chuan Zhou; Stefania Bandinelli
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Confidence interval estimation of the difference between two sensitivities to the early disease stage.

Authors:  Tuochuan Dong; Le Kang; Alan Hutson; Chengjie Xiong; Lili Tian
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 2.207

9.  Proteomics identification of desmin as a potential oncofetal diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yanlei Ma; Jiayuan Peng; Weijie Liu; Peng Zhang; Long Huang; Benbo Gao; Tongyi Shen; Yukun Zhou; Hongqi Chen; Zhaoxin Chu; Ming Zhang; Huanlong Qin
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 5.911

10.  ROC Estimation from Clustered Data with an Application to Liver Cancer Data.

Authors:  Joungyoun Kim; Sung-Cheol Yun; Johan Lim; Moo-Song Lee; Won Son; DoHwan Park
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2016-12-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.