Literature DB >> 20354227

Lehmann family of ROC curves.

Mithat Gönen1, Glenn Heller.   

Abstract

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves evaluate the discriminatory power of a continuous marker to predict a binary outcome. The most popular parametric model for an ROC curve is the binormal model, which assumes that the marker, after a monotone transformation, is normally distributed conditional on the outcome. Here, the authors present an alternative to the binormal model based on the Lehmann family, also known as the proportional hazards specification. The resulting ROC curve and its functionals (such as the area under the curve and the sensitivity at a given level of specificity) have simple analytic forms. Closed-form expressions for the functional estimates and their corresponding asymptotic variances are derived. This family accommodates the comparison of multiple markers, covariate adjustments, and clustered data through a regression formulation. Evaluation of the underlying assumptions, model fitting, and model selection can be performed using any off-the-shelf proportional hazards statistical software package.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20354227      PMCID: PMC4590288          DOI: 10.1177/0272989X09360067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  14 in total

1.  An interpretation for the ROC curve and inference using GLM procedures.

Authors:  M S Pepe
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Estimation of the area under the ROC curve.

Authors:  David Faraggi; Benjamin Reiser
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Adjusting the generalized ROC curve for covariates.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; David Faraggi; Benjamin Reiser
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  The use of the 'binormal' model for parametric ROC analysis of quantitative diagnostic tests.

Authors:  J A Hanley
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Three approaches to regression analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous test results.

Authors:  M S Pepe
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Evaluation of confounding effects in ROC studies.

Authors:  C T Le
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  A general regression methodology for ROC curve estimation.

Authors:  A N Tosteson; C B Begg
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1988 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of signal detection theory--a direct solution.

Authors:  D D Dorfman; E Alf
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 2.500

9.  Benign and malignant processes: normal values and differentiation with chemical shift MR imaging in vertebral marrow.

Authors:  Donald C Zajick; William B Morrison; Mark E Schweitzer; Joan Antoni Parellada; John A Carrino
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Testing for fetal pulmonary maturity: ROC analysis involving covariates, verification bias, and combination testing.

Authors:  M G Hunink; D K Richardson; P M Doubilet; C B Begg
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1990 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparing the Diagnostics Accuracy of CD4+ T-Lymphocyte Count and Percent as a Surrogate Markers of Pediatric HIV Disease.

Authors:  Musie Ghebremichael; Haben Michael; Jack Tubbs; Elijah Paintsil
Journal:  J Math Stat       Date:  2019-04-03

2.  Non-small cell lung cancer is characterized by dramatic changes in phospholipid profiles.

Authors:  Eyra Marien; Michael Meister; Thomas Muley; Steffen Fieuws; Sergio Bordel; Rita Derua; Jeffrey Spraggins; Raf Van de Plas; Jonas Dehairs; Jens Wouters; Muralidhararao Bagadi; Hendrik Dienemann; Michael Thomas; Philipp A Schnabel; Richard M Caprioli; Etienne Waelkens; Johannes V Swinnen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Meta-analysis and meta-modelling for diagnostic problems.

Authors:  Suphada Charoensawat; Walailuck Böhning; Dankmar Böhning; Heinz Holling
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  ROC Estimation from Clustered Data with an Application to Liver Cancer Data.

Authors:  Joungyoun Kim; Sung-Cheol Yun; Johan Lim; Moo-Song Lee; Won Son; DoHwan Park
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2016-12-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.