Literature DB >> 15486171

Factor structure of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire: examination of a method factor.

Holly Hazlett-Stevens1, Jodie B Ullman, Michelle G Craske.   

Abstract

The Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) was originally designed as a unifactorial measure of pathological trait worry. However, recent studies supported a two-factor solution with positively worded items loading on the first factor and reverse-scored items loading on a second factor. The current study compared this two-factor model to a negative wording method factor solution among college students. A method factor model with all PSWQ items loading on a single worry factor and reverse-scored items loading on a negative wording method factor provided as good a fit as the two-factor model. This method factor alone did not predict a generalized anxiety disorder diagnosis. Finally, the psychometric properties of an abbreviated scale containing only positively worded items were examined. The PSWQ appears to measure a single unitary construct, but response patterns differ between positively worded and reverse-scored items. Theoretical implications for pathological worry and assessment-related issues are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15486171     DOI: 10.1177/1073191104269872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Assessment        ISSN: 1073-1911


  13 in total

1.  Bifactor models and rotations: exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores.

Authors:  Steven P Reise; Tyler M Moore; Mark G Haviland
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2010-11

2.  Penn State Worry Questionnaire: structure and psychometric properties of the Chinese version.

Authors:  Jie Zhong; Chun Wang; Jie Li; Jun Liu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.066

3.  More reasons to be straightforward: findings and norms for two scales relevant to social anxiety.

Authors:  Thomas L Rodebaugh; Richard G Heimberg; Patrick J Brown; Katya C Fernandez; Carlos Blanco; Franklin R Schneier; Michael R Liebowitz
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2011-02-13

4.  Factor analytic and item response theory evaluation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire in women with cancer.

Authors:  Salene M Wu; Tammy A Schuler; Michael C Edwards; Hae-Chung Yang; Brittany M Brothers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Self-Stigma in Substance Abuse: Development of a New Measure.

Authors:  Jason B Luoma; Richard H Nobles; Chad E Drake; Steven C Hayes; Alyssa O'Hair; Lindsay Fletcher; Barbara S Kohlenberg
Journal:  J Psychopathol Behav Assess       Date:  2013-06-01

6.  The Penn State Worry Questionnaire for Children: Age, Gender and Clinical Invariance.

Authors:  Costina R Păsărelu; Anca Dobrean; Robert Balazsi; Elena Predescu; Roxana Şipos; Viorel Lupu
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2017-06

7.  The Everyday Feeling Questionnaire: the structure and validation of a measure of general psychological well-being and distress.

Authors:  Rudolf Uher; Robert Goodman
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2009-05-24       Impact factor: 4.328

8.  A randomized controlled trial of a smartphone-based application for the treatment of anxiety.

Authors:  Michelle G Newman; Nicholas C Jacobson; Gavin N Rackoff; Megan Jones Bell; C Barr Taylor
Journal:  Psychother Res       Date:  2020-07-14

9.  Psychometric properties of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI) and its short-form (GAI-SF) in a clinical and non-clinical sample of older adults.

Authors:  Carly Johnco; Ashleigh Knight; Dusanka Tadic; Viviana M Wuthrich
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.878

10.  Ineffectiveness of reverse wording of questionnaire items: let's learn from cows in the rain.

Authors:  Eric van Sonderen; Robbert Sanderman; James C Coyne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.