Literature DB >> 10504882

Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation.

R Lawson1.   

Abstract

Visual object constancy is the ability to recognise an object from its image despite variation in the image when the object is viewed from different angles. I describe research which probes the human visual system's ability to achieve object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation. I focus on the ecologically important case of recognising familiar objects, although the recognition of novel objects is also discussed. Cognitive neuropsychological studies of patients with specific deficits in achieving object constancy are reviewed, in addition to studies which test neurally intact subjects. In certain cases, the recognition of invariant features allows objects to be recognised irrespective of the view depicted, particularly if small, distinctive sets of objects are presented repeatedly. In contrast, in most situations, recognition is sensitive to both the view in-plane and in-depth from which an object is depicted. This result suggests that multiple, view-specific, stored representations of familiar objects are accessed in everyday, entry-level visual recognition, or that transformations such as mental rotation or interpolation are used to transform between retinal images of objects and view-specific, stored representations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10504882     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(98)00052-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  15 in total

1.  Effects of plane rotation, task, and complexity on recognition of familiar and chimeric objects.

Authors:  Toby J Lloyd-Jones; Linda Luckhurst
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-06

2.  Perceptual completion and object-based representations in short-term visual memory.

Authors:  Peter Walker; Simon J Davies
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-07

3.  View sensitivity increases for same-shape matches if mismatches show pairs of more similar shapes.

Authors:  Rebecca Lawson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-10

4.  No symmetry advantage when object matching involves accidental viewpoints.

Authors:  Arno Koning; Rob van Lier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-10-07

5.  Fundamental failures of shape constancy resulting from cortical anisotropy.

Authors:  Elias H Cohen; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Mental visualization of objects from cross-sectional images.

Authors:  Bing Wu; Roberta L Klatzky; George D Stetten
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-01-02

7.  fMRI activity patterns in human LOC carry information about object exemplars within category.

Authors:  Evelyn Eger; John Ashburner; John-Dylan Haynes; Raymond J Dolan; Geraint Rees
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  The gender-specific face aftereffect is based in retinotopic not spatiotopic coordinates across several natural image transformations.

Authors:  Arash Afraz; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Shape beyond recognition: form-derived directionality and its effects on visual attention and motion perception.

Authors:  Heida M Sigurdardottir; Suzanne M Michalak; David L Sheinberg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2013-04-08

10.  Size-sensitive perceptual representations underlie visual and haptic object recognition.

Authors:  Matt Craddock; Rebecca Lawson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.