Literature DB >> 15480714

The German version of the Oxford Shoulder Score--cross-cultural adaptation and validation.

Wolfgang Huber1, Jochen G Hofstaetter, Beatrice Hanslik-Schnabel, Martin Posch, Christian Wurnig.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The evaluation of health-related quality of life is an established criterion for the evaluation of therapeutic measurement. Especially in the English language, a great number of different questionnaires have been developed. The original, English-language 12-item Oxford shoulder score (OSS) is a recently developed and validated patient-completed outcome measure specifically designed for the evaluation of patients suffering from shoulder pathology other than instability. Because of the lack of a comparable instrument in German, this questionnaire was translated into German and subsequently tested for validity and reliability in a cross-sectional study.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Translation of the OSS was done according to the guidelines in the literature. One hundred two patients completed the German version of the OSS and the SF-36. Additionally, the Constant shoulder score and the UCLA shoulder score were included into the validation process. The psychometric properties feasibility and patient-burden parameters were also tested.
RESULTS: The patients completed all questionnaires. The mean time required for completing the OSS was 3 min, 25 s; the mean time required for evaluation of the questionnaire was 35 s. The internal consistency tested by the Cronbach's alpha (0.94) was high. The reproducibility tested by two different methods showed no significant difference. The construct validity showed a significant correlation between the OSS and the other scores.
CONCLUSION: The instrument proved to be valid by demonstrating the same correlations predicted by standard clinical assessments and a generic patient-based instrument. Application and evaluation in clinical trial proved feasible and minimally time consuming. Therefore, the German translation of the Oxford shoulder score is a valid and reliable tool, applicable to outcome studies on shoulder patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15480714     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-004-0716-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  26 in total

1.  The development and validation of a questionnaire for rotator cuff disorders: The Functional Shoulder Score.

Authors:  Anestis Iossifidis; Edward F Ibrahim; Charalambos Petrou; Antonis Galanos
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2015-09-23

2.  Repair of Lafosse I subscapularis lesions brings no benefit in anterosuperior rotator cuff reconstruction.

Authors:  Barbara Wirth; Sebastian Kunz; Hans-Kaspar Schwyzer; Matthias Flury; Maximilian Lenz; Laurent Audigé
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  [Open transosseous reconstruction of the rotator cuff: clinical outcome, influencing factors and complications].

Authors:  D Maier; M Jaeger; K Izadpanah; D Herschel; P Ogon; P C Strohm; N P Südkamp
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Open reduction and fixation with a locking plate without bone grafting is a reasonable and safe option for treating proximal humerus nonunion.

Authors:  Stefan Quadlbauer; Georg J Hofmann; Martin Leixnering; Rudolf Rosenauer; Thomas Hausner; Jürgen Reichetseder
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Comparative responsiveness and minimal change for the Oxford Elbow Score following surgery.

Authors:  Jill Dawson; Helen Doll; Irene Boller; Ray Fitzpatrick; Christopher Little; Jonathan Rees; Andrew Carr
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Impact of adhesive capsulitis on quality of life in elderly subjects with diabetes: A cross sectional study.

Authors:  Saumen Gupta; Kavitha Raja; N Manikandan
Journal:  Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries       Date:  2008-10

7.  Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the polish version of the Oxford Shoulder Score in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Agnieszka Bejer; Magdalena Szczepanik; Jędrzej Płocki; Daniel Szymczyk; Marek Kulczyk; Teresa Pop
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 8.  [Influencing factors and complications in open treatment of acute anterior glenoid rim fractures].

Authors:  Dirk Maier; K Izadpanah; J Bayer; E R Langenmair; P Ogon; N P Südkamp; M Jaeger
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  Posterior open wedge glenoid osteotomy provides reliable results in young patients with increased glenoid retroversion and posterior shoulder instability.

Authors:  Lucca Lacheta; Taran S P Singh; Jean M Hovsepian; Sepp Braun; Andreas B Imhoff; Jonas Pogorzelski
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Measuring outcomes in rotator cuff disorders.

Authors:  Aditya Prinja; Sanjeeve Sabharwal; Sebastian Moshtael; Paola Dey; Puneet Monga
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.