Literature DB >> 15480606

Individual differences discriminate event-related potentials but not performance during response inhibition.

Richard A P Roche1, Hugh Garavan, John J Foxe, Shane M O'Mara.   

Abstract

Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded from 20 normal participants while they completed a Go/NoGo response inhibition task. Previous ERP studies have implicated the N2 and P3 waveforms as the main indices of processing in this task, and functional brain imaging has shown parietal, prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices to be involved in response inhibition. 32-channel ERP analysis revealed amplitude differences in the N2/P3 components when stimuli that required a button-press (Go stimuli) were compared with stimuli for which the response had to be withheld (No-Go stimuli), and in N2 and P3 latencies when successful withholds to No-Go stimuli were compared with unsuccessful attempts to inhibit. Further differences in the N2/P3 complex emerged when participants were grouped in terms of a measure of absentmindedness (the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire, CFQ); larger and earlier components were found for high CFQ respondents. We conclude that the latencies of the N2 and P3 may be the critical indicators of active inhibitory processes for this task, suggesting that a pattern of sequential activation rather than altered activity level in key structures may mediate success on the task. In addition, highly absentminded participants exhibited larger components for errors than did less absentminded participants when performing at the same level, which implies that the absentminded may require greater activity in the neural substrates of response inhibition in order to accomplish this task at a comparable level of performance to less absentminded participants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15480606     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1985-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  25 in total

1.  Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task.

Authors:  H Bokura; S Yamaguchi; S Kobayashi
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition.

Authors:  M Falkenstein; J Hoormann; J Hohnsbein
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1999-04

3.  Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task.

Authors:  E Jodo; Y Kayama
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-06

4.  Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance.

Authors:  C S Carter; T S Braver; D M Barch; M M Botvinick; D Noll; J D Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability.

Authors:  C C Duncan-Johnson; E Donchin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  ERPs to response production and inhibition.

Authors:  A Pfefferbaum; J M Ford; B J Weller; B S Kopell
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-05

7.  Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study.

Authors:  H Garavan; T J Ross; E A Stein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The selection and suppression of action: ERP correlates of executive control in humans.

Authors:  S R Jackson; G M Jackson; M Roberts
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1999-03-17       Impact factor: 1.837

9.  Inhibition of ongoing responses in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Martina Rieger; Siegfried Gauggel
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Behavioural and electrophysiological correlates of visuomotor learning during a visual search task.

Authors:  Richard A P Roche; Shane M O'Mara
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-01
View more
  33 in total

Review 1.  Cognitive effects of nicotine: genetic moderators.

Authors:  Aryeh I Herman; Mehmet Sofuoglu
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 4.280

2.  The relationship between reaction time and response variability and somatosensory No-go potentials.

Authors:  Hiroki Nakata; Kiwako Sakamoto; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Neurocognitive deficits in male alcoholics: an ERP/sLORETA analysis of the N2 component in an equal probability Go/NoGo task.

Authors:  A K Pandey; C Kamarajan; Y Tang; D B Chorlian; B N Roopesh; N Manz; A Stimus; M Rangaswamy; B Porjesz
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.251

4.  Inhibiting prepotent responses in the elderly: Distraction and disinhibition.

Authors:  Shulan Hsieh; Mengyao Wu; Chien-Hui Tang
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Executive brain functions after exposure to nocturnal traffic noise: effects of task difficulty and sleep quality.

Authors:  Sergei A Schapkin; Michael Falkenstein; Anke Marks; Barbara Griefahn
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 6.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of inhibition: cognitive control, source localization and age-related modulations.

Authors:  Luís Pires; José Leitão; Chiara Guerrini; Mário R Simões
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 7.444

7.  Neural and behavioral correlates of extended training during sleep deprivation in humans: evidence for local, task-specific effects.

Authors:  Giulio Bernardi; Francesca Siclari; Xiaoqian Yu; Corinna Zennig; Michele Bellesi; Emiliano Ricciardi; Chiara Cirelli; Maria Felice Ghilardi; Pietro Pietrini; Giulio Tononi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Stimulus sequence context differentially modulates inhibition-related theta and delta band activity in a go/no-go task.

Authors:  Jeremy Harper; Stephen M Malone; Matthew D Bachman; Edward M Bernat
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 9.  Somato-motor inhibitory processing in humans: evidence from neurophysiology and neuroimaging.

Authors:  Hiroki Nakata; Kiwako Sakamoto; Yukiko Honda; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 2.781

10.  Cortical activity differs during nicotine deprivation versus satiation in heavy smokers.

Authors:  David E Evans; Steven K Sutton; Jason A Oliver; David J Drobes
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.