Literature DB >> 11738192

Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task.

H Bokura1, S Yamaguchi, S Kobayashi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) during a Go/NoGo task were investigated to elucidate the electrophysiological basis for executive and inhibitory control of responses.
METHODS: We studied Go/NoGo ERPs in 13 healthy subjects during a modified continuous performance test using high-density electroencephalogram (EEG) recording. We measured peak latency, amplitude, and topographic distribution of the components, and analyzed the neural sources using low-resolution electromagnetic tomography.
RESULTS: There were no differences between the Go and NoGo conditions in the latency, amplitude, scalp topography, or the electrical source localization of the P1 and N1 components. The N2 component was seen only in the NoGo ERP, and its source was located in the right lateral orbitofrontal and cingulate cortex. The NoGo-P3 component had larger amplitude and longer latency, and was more anteriorly localized than Go-P3; Go-P3 was located mainly in the medial part of the parietal cortex, whereas the NoGo-P3 activity was observed in the left lateral orbitofrontal cortex.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the lateral orbitofrontal and anterior cingulate areas play critical roles in the inhibitory control of behavior and that both hemispheres are involved in inhibitory cognitive function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11738192     DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00691-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  168 in total

1.  The relationship between reaction time and response variability and somatosensory No-go potentials.

Authors:  Hiroki Nakata; Kiwako Sakamoto; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: effects of response conflict and trial type frequency.

Authors:  Sander Nieuwenhuis; Nick Yeung; Wery van den Wildenberg; K Richard Ridderinkhof
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Stimulus and response ERP analyses of a two-level reaction time task.

Authors:  Andres Posada; Pascal Vianin; Marie-Hélène Giard; Nicolas Franck
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Differential influences of exercise intensity on information processing in the central nervous system.

Authors:  Keita Kamijo; Yoshiaki Nishihira; Arihiro Hatta; Takeshi Kaneda; Toshiaki Wasaka; Tetsuo Kida; Kazuo Kuroiwa
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-04-09       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Event-related brain potential changes after Choto-san administration in stroke patients with mild cognitive impairments.

Authors:  Shuhei Yamaguchi; Miwa Matsubara; Shotai Kobayashi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Neurocognitive deficits in male alcoholics: an ERP/sLORETA analysis of the N2 component in an equal probability Go/NoGo task.

Authors:  A K Pandey; C Kamarajan; Y Tang; D B Chorlian; B N Roopesh; N Manz; A Stimus; M Rangaswamy; B Porjesz
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.251

7.  Performance monitoring local field potentials in the medial frontal cortex of primates: supplementary eye field.

Authors:  Erik E Emeric; Melanie Leslie; Pierre Pouget; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Beneficial effects of electrostimulation contingencies on sustained attention and electrocortical activity.

Authors:  Max Jean-Lon Chen; Trevor Thompson; Juri Kropotov; John H Gruzelier
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 5.243

9.  Protracted impairment of impulse control under an acute dose of alcohol: a time-course analysis.

Authors:  Melissa A Miller; Mark T Fillmore
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.913

10.  Gender differences in the relation between the late positive potential in response to anxiety sensitivity images and self-reported anxiety sensitivity.

Authors:  Nicholas P Allan; Matt R Judah; Brian J Albanese; Richard J Macatee; Carson A Sutton; Matthew D Bachman; Edward M Bernat; Norman B Schmidt
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2018-03-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.