Literature DB >> 15480548

Mixed venous blood gas sampling is not influenced by the speed of withdrawal in cardiac surgery patients.

Emmanuel Sirdar1, Jean-Gilles Guimond, Isabelle Coiteux, Sylvain Bélisle, Denis Babin, Marie-Claude Guertin, André Denault.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether mixed venous blood gas sampling obtained by pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) is influenced by the speed of withdrawal.
DESIGN: Prospective, observational study.
SETTING: Surgical intensive care unit at a university hospital.
SUBJECTS: Twenty-five patients in the early postoperative period of cardiac surgery.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After verification of the adequate position of the PAC, measurements of mixed venous blood gas oxygen saturation, oxygen partial pressure (PO(2)), carbon dioxide partial pressure (PCO(2)), pH and bicarbonates were obtained at two different rates of withdrawal. A slow sampling was taken at a mean speed of 3 ml/min and a fast sampling at 18 ml/min for each patient. The mean difference in venous oxygen saturation between slow and fast samplings was -0.18+/-1.3%, venous PO(2): -0.2+/-1.3 mmHg, venous PCO(2): 0.1+/-0.9 mmHg, venous pH: 0+/-0.03, venous bicarbonates: 0.03+/-0.5 mmol/l.
CONCLUSION: Using the Bland & Altman method, we showed a satisfactory agreement between slow and fast mixed venous blood gas sampling techniques when measuring PO(2), oxygen saturation, PCO(2), pH and bicarbonates though a PAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15480548     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-004-2392-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  7 in total

1.  Bedside estimation of risk as an aid for decision-making in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  A D Bernstein; V Parsonnet
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients.

Authors:  James Dean Sandham; Russell Douglas Hull; Rollin Frederick Brant; Linda Knox; Graham Frederick Pineo; Christopher J Doig; Denny P Laporta; Sidney Viner; Louise Passerini; Hugh Devitt; Ann Kirby; Michael Jacka
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Errors in data derived from pulmonary artery blood gas values.

Authors:  P M Suter; J M Lindauer; H B Fairley; R M Schlobohm
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1975 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Direct blood pressure measurement--dynamic response requirements.

Authors:  R M Gardner
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators.

Authors:  A F Connors; T Speroff; N V Dawson; C Thomas; F E Harrell; D Wagner; N Desbiens; L Goldman; A W Wu; R M Califf; W J Fulkerson; H Vidaillet; S Broste; P Bellamy; J Lynn; W A Knaus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-09-18       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The lack of effect of variable blood withdrawal rates on the measurement of mixed venous oxygen saturation.

Authors:  F Mihm; T W Feeley; M Rosenthal; T A Raffin
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 9.410

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.