Literature DB >> 15479999

Parallel imaging in MR angiography.

Gregory J Wilson1, Romhild M Hoogeveen, Winfried A Willinek, Raja Muthupillai, Jeffrey H Maki.   

Abstract

The recently developed techniques of parallel imaging with phased array coils are rapidly becoming accepted for magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) applications. This article reviews the various current parallel imaging techniques and their application to MRA. The increased scan efficiency provided by parallel imaging allows increased temporal or spatial resolution, and reduction of artifacts in contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA). Increased temporal resolution in CE-MRA can be used to reduce the need for bolus timing and to provide hemodynamic information helpful for diagnosis. In addition, increased spatial resolution (or volume coverage) can be acquired in a breathhold (eg, in renal CE-MRA), or in otherwise limited clinically acceptable scan durations. The increased scan efficiency provided by parallel imaging has been successfully applied to CE-MRA as well as other MRA techniques such as inflow and phase contrast imaging. The large signal-to-noise ratio available in many MRA techniques lends these acquisitions to increased scan efficiency through parallel imaging.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15479999     DOI: 10.1097/01.rmr.0000134199.94874.70

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0899-3459


  9 in total

1.  Performance characteristics of magnetic resonance imaging without contrast agents or sedation in pediatric appendicitis.

Authors:  Ryne A Didier; Katharine L Hopkins; Fergus V Coakley; Sanjay Krishnaswami; David M Spiro; Bryan R Foster
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-06-19

2.  Combination of 2D sensitivity encoding and 2D partial fourier techniques for improved acceleration in 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography.

Authors:  Houchun H Hu; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; David G Kruger; James F Glockner; Stephen J Riederer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Intracranial contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance venography with 6.4-fold sensitivity encoding at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Houchun H Hu; Clifton R Haider; Norbert G Campeau; John Huston; Stephen J Riederer
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance angiography: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Michael P Hartung; Thomas M Grist; Christopher J François
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.364

5.  Max CAPR: high-resolution 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography with acquisition times under 5 seconds.

Authors:  Clifton R Haider; Eric A Borisch; James F Glockner; Petrice M Mostardi; Phillip J Rossman; Phillip M Young; Stephen J Riederer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  High-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the intracranial venous system with fourfold accelerated two-dimensional sensitivity encoding.

Authors:  Houchun H Hu; Norbert G Campeau; John Huston; David G Kruger; Clifton R Haider; Stephen J Riederer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  HASTE sequence with parallel acquisition and T2 decay compensation: application to carotid artery imaging.

Authors:  Ling Zhang; Eugene G Kholmovski; Junyu Guo; Seong-Eun Kim Choi; Glen R Morrell; Dennis L Parker
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  3D high temporal and spatial resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the whole brain.

Authors:  Clifton R Haider; Houchun Harry Hu; Norbert G Campeau; John Huston; Stephen J Riederer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 9.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria® pulsatile abdominal mass, suspected abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Benoit Desjardins; Karin E Dill; Scott D Flamm; Christopher J Francois; Marie D Gerhard-Herman; Sanjeeva P Kalva; M Ashraf Mansour; Emile R Mohler; Isabel B Oliva; Matthew P Schenker; Clifford Weiss; Frank J Rybicki
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-05-27       Impact factor: 2.357

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.