Literature DB >> 15479710

A simple procedure for estimating the false discovery rate.

Cyril Dalmasso1, Philippe Broët, Thierry Moreau.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: The most used criterion in microarray data analysis is nowadays the false discovery rate (FDR). In the framework of estimating procedures based on the marginal distribution of the P-values without any assumption on gene expression changes, estimators of the FDR are necessarily conservatively biased. Indeed, only an upper bound estimate can be obtained for the key quantity pi0, which is the probability for a gene to be unmodified. In this paper, we propose a novel family of estimators for pi0 that allows the calculation of FDR.
RESULTS: The very simple method for estimating pi0 called LBE (Location Based Estimator) is presented together with results on its variability. Simulation results indicate that the proposed estimator performs well in finite sample and has the best mean square error in most of the cases as compared with the procedures QVALUE, BUM and SPLOSH. The different procedures are then applied to real datasets. AVAILABILITY: The R function LBE is available at http://ifr69.vjf.inserm.fr/lbe CONTACT: broet@vjf.inserm.fr.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15479710     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  42 in total

1.  Power of data mining methods to detect genetic associations and interactions.

Authors:  Annette M Molinaro; Nicholas Carriero; Robert Bjornson; Patricia Hartge; Nathaniel Rothman; Nilanjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 0.444

2.  Genome scanning by composite likelihood.

Authors:  Newton Morton; Nikolas Maniatis; Weihua Zhang; Sarah Ennis; Andrew Collins
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Estimating the posterior probability that genome-wide association findings are true or false.

Authors:  József Bukszár; Joseph L McClay; Edwin J C G van den Oord
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  A censored beta mixture model for the estimation of the proportion of non-differentially expressed genes.

Authors:  Anastasios Markitsis; Yinglei Lai
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Comments on the analysis of unbalanced microarray data.

Authors:  Kathleen F Kerr
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Multiple hypothesis testing in proteomics: a strategy for experimental work.

Authors:  Angel P Diz; Antonio Carvajal-Rodríguez; David O F Skibinski
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.911

7.  Estimating effect sizes in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  József Bukszár; Edwin J C G van den Oord
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 2.805

8.  Identifying common prognostic factors in genomic cancer studies: a novel index for censored outcomes.

Authors:  Sigrid Rouam; Thierry Moreau; Philippe Broët
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  VAMP8/endobrevin is overexpressed in hyperreactive human platelets: suggested role for platelet microRNA.

Authors:  A A Kondkar; M S Bray; S M Leal; S Nagalla; D J Liu; Y Jin; J F Dong; Q Ren; S W Whiteheart; C Shaw; P F Bray
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 5.824

10.  A new multitest correction (SGoF) that increases its statistical power when increasing the number of tests.

Authors:  Antonio Carvajal-Rodríguez; Jacobo de Uña-Alvarez; Emilio Rolán-Alvarez
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.