Literature DB >> 15478970

Direct sampled I/Q beamforming for compact and very low-cost ultrasound imaging.

Karthik Ranganathan1, Mary K Santy, Travis N Blalock, John A Hossack, William F Walker.   

Abstract

A wide variety of beamforming approaches are applied in modern ultrasound scanners, ranging from optimal time domain beamforming strategies at one end to rudimentary narrowband schemes at the other. Although significant research has been devoted to improving image quality, usually at the expense of beamformer complexity, we are interested in investigating strategies that sacrifice some image quality in exchange for reduced cost and ease in implementation. This paper describes the direct sampled in-phase/quadrature (DSIQ) beamformer, which is one such low-cost, extremely simple, and compact approach. DSIQ beamforming relies on phase rotation of I/Q data to implement focusing. The I/Q data are generated by directly sampling the received radio frequency (RF) signal, rather than through conventional demodulation. We describe an efficient hardware implementation of the beamformer, which results in significant reductions in beamformer size and cost. We present the results of simulations and experiments that compare the DSIQ beamformer to more conventional approaches, namely, time delay beamforming and traditional complex demodulated I/Q beamforming. Results that show the effect of an error in the direct sampling process, as well as dependence on signal bandwidth and system f number (f#) are also presented. These results indicate that the image quality and robustness of the DSIQ beamformer are adequate for low end scanners. We also describe implementation of the DSIQ beamformer in an inexpensive hand-held ultrasound system being developed in our laboratory.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15478970     DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2004.1334841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  7 in total

1.  Fabrication and evaluation of fully-sampled, two-dimensional transducer array for "Sonic Window" imaging system.

Authors:  Matthew D C Eames; John A Hossack
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  Application of X-Y separable 2-D array beamforming for increased frame rate and energy efficiency in handheld devices.

Authors:  Kevin Owen; Michael Fuller; John Hossack
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Volumetric real-time imaging using a CMUT ring array.

Authors:  Jung Woo Choe; Ömer Oralkan; Amin Nikoozadeh; Mustafa Gencel; Douglas N Stephens; Matthew O'Donnell; David J Sahn; Butrus T Khuri-Yakub
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  GPU-based real-time volumetric ultrasound image reconstruction for a ring array.

Authors:  Jung Woo Choe; Amin Nikoozadeh; Omer Oralkan; Butrus T Khuri-Yakub
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Filled and unfilled temperature-dependent epoxy resin blends for lossy transducer substrates.

Authors:  Matthew D C Eames; John A Hossack
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  High-Frequency Array-Based Nanobubble Nonlinear Imaging in a Phantom and In Vivo.

Authors:  Carly Pellow; Emmanuel Cherin; Eric C Abenojar; Agata A Exner; Gang Zheng; Christine E M Demore; David E Goertz
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Comparison of synthetic aperture architectures for miniaturised ultrasound imaging front-ends.

Authors:  Graham Peyton; Martyn G Boutelle; Emmanuel M Drakakis
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 2.819

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.