Literature DB >> 15476578

Intermittent ibandronate preserves bone quality and bone strength in the lumbar spine after 16 months of treatment in the ovariectomized cynomolgus monkey.

Ralph Müller1, Mary Hannan, Susan Y Smith, Frieder Bauss.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The dose-dependent effect of ibandronate treatment on bone mass and architecture was assessed in a large animal study of OVX monkeys using microCT for quantitative bone morphometry and biomechanical testing for measures of bone strength. The study showed that intermittent ibandronate preserved lumbar spine bone quality and strength in these animals after 16 months of treatment.
INTRODUCTION: Ibandronate is a bisphosphonate, which is a class of compounds that, in pharmacologically active doses, not only suppresses bone resorption and turnover but also prevents loss of bone mass and strength in the ovariectomized (OVX) rat.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the effects of ibandronate on bone mass and architecture in the OVX cynomolgus macaque. Sixty-one adult female macaques were divided into five groups (N = 11-15): sham control, OVX control, and OVX low- (10 microg/kg), medium- (30 microg/kg), and high- (150 microg/kg) dose ibandronate. Treatment was administered by intravenous bolus injection every 30 days for 16 months starting at ovariectomy. This dosing schedule is equivalent to a 3-monthly dosing regimen in human subjects over 4 years. Animals were killed at the conclusion of the study, and excised bone specimens of the first lumbar vertebra (L1) were evaluated for quantitative bone densitometry, morphometry, and mechanical properties. Architectural parameters were assessed by microCT including direct 3D bone morphometry. A measure of specimen strength was obtained using destructive compression testing. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: A significant loss of bone mass and related changes in bone architecture after ovariectomy resulted in a reduction of whole bone strength as expressed by high correlations between architectural and mechanical properties. In this analysis, BMC was the best single predictor of whole bone strength (r2 = 67%). Nevertheless, including architectural indices in a multiple linear regression analysis increased that prediction to 88%. With respect to the treatment, the medium- and high-dose groups were not significantly different from the sham group for all bone mineral and structural parameters. Additionally, significant differences were seen for all measured parameters between the high-dose group and the OVX group, and for some parameters, between the medium-dose group and the OVX group. Intermittent ibandronate treatment effectively and dose-dependently prevented bone loss, architectural deterioration, and strength reduction in the lumbar spine of OVX monkeys.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15476578     DOI: 10.1359/JBMR.040809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  29 in total

1.  The beneficial effect of Radix Dipsaci total saponins on bone metabolism in vitro and in vivo and the possible mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Y B Niu; Y H Li; X H Kong; R Zhang; Y Sun; Q Li; C Li; L Liu; J Wang; Q B Mei
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Evaluation of crystallographic orientation of biological apatite in vertebral cortical bone in ovariectomized cynomolgus monkeys treated with minodronic acid and alendronate.

Authors:  Makoto Tanaka; Aira Matsugaki; Takuya Ishimoto; Takayoshi Nakano
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 3.  Trabecular bone failure at the microstructural level.

Authors:  Ralph Müller; G Harry van Lenthe
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 4.  A biomechanical perspective on bone quality.

Authors:  C J Hernandez; T M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Preventative ibandronate treatment has the most beneficial effect on the microstructure of bone in experimental tumor osteolysis.

Authors:  Andreas A Kurth; Soo-Zin Kim; Marie Shea; Frieder Bauss; Wilson C Hayes; Ralph Müller
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2007-02-26       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Does thoracic or lumbar spine bone architecture predict vertebral failure strength more accurately than density?

Authors:  E-M Lochmüller; K Pöschl; L Würstlin; M Matsuura; R Müller; T M Link; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Role of trabecular microarchitecture in whole-vertebral body biomechanical behavior.

Authors:  Aaron J Fields; Senthil K Eswaran; Michael G Jekir; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 8.  Hierarchical microimaging of bone structure and function.

Authors:  Ralph Müller
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 20.543

9.  Analysis of sintered polymer scaffolds using concomitant synchrotron computed tomography and in situ mechanical testing.

Authors:  A Dhillon; P Schneider; G Kuhn; Y Reinwald; L J White; A Levchuk; F R A J Rose; R Müller; K M Shakesheff; C V Rahman
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Effects of suppression of bone turnover on cortical and trabecular load sharing in the canine vertebral body.

Authors:  Senthil K Eswaran; Grant Bevill; Prem Nagarathnam; Matthew R Allen; David B Burr; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.