Literature DB >> 15474579

Preserved gain control for luminance contrast during binocular rivalry suppression.

Katsumi Watanabe1, Young Paik, Randolph Blake.   

Abstract

Binocular rivalry elevates contrast increment thresholds for the detection of a transient stimulus presented to the suppressed eye, while thresholds measured during dominance are identical to those during monocular viewing (e.g. [Wales, R., & Fox, R. (1970). Increment detection thresholds during binocular rivalry suppression. Perception and Psychophysics, 8, 90-94]). It is well established that contrast increment thresholds depend on reference (pedestal) contrast. With high contrasts, increment thresholds increase with pedestal contrast, reflecting a gain control with sigmoidal non-linearity. We examined how this gain control mechanism operates during binocular rivalry (i.e., with and without perception of a pedestal mask). Subjects viewed a horizontal sine-wave grating (steady pedestal) and a radial checkerboard dichoptically. When the grating achieved a pre-specified phenomenal state (dominance or suppressed), subjects initiated the transient presentation (500-ms Gaussian pulse) of a contrast increment of the same spatial frequency. The pulse appeared in either the upper or lower half of the pedestal. Subjects indicated which half of the pedestal contained the pulse. Contrast increment thresholds were measured using a staircase method with various pedestal contrasts, which yielded threshold versus contrast (TvC) functions during dominance and suppression. The measured thresholds were reliably higher during suppression, but the rising slopes of TvC functions did not differ significantly between dominance and suppression (i.e., constant upward shift of TvC function). A control experiment demonstrated that the TvC function during dominance was identical to that during non-rivalry, monocular viewing. Evidently, the contrast gain control for transient luminance increment does not require the perception of pedestal contrast.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15474579     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  10 in total

1.  Visual sensitivity underlying changes in visual consciousness.

Authors:  David Alais; John Cass; Robert P O'Shea; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Revealing boundary-contour based surface representation through the time course of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Yong R Su; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The magnitude and dynamics of interocular suppression affected by monocular boundary contour and conflicting local features.

Authors:  Yong R Su; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Eye-specific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  John-Dylan Haynes; Ralf Deichmann; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-10-23       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Modulation of spatiotemporal dynamics of binocular rivalry by collinear facilitation and pattern-dependent adaptation.

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang; Sang-Hun Lee; June Kim; David Heeger; Randolph Blake
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Detecting contrast changes in invisible patterns during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Sam Ling; Bjorn Hubert-Wallander; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Normalization regulates competition for visual awareness.

Authors:  Sam Ling; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Can Contrast-Response Functions Indicate Visual Processing Levels?

Authors:  Bruno G Breitmeyer; Srimant P Tripathy; James M Brown
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-01

9.  Steady-state measures of visual suppression.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Greta Vilidaite; Alex R Wade
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 10.  On the use of continuous flash suppression for the study of visual processing outside of awareness.

Authors:  Eunice Yang; Jan Brascamp; Min-Suk Kang; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.