Literature DB >> 15474548

Effects of naturalistic cell phone conversations on driving performance.

Michael E Rakauskas1, Leo J Gugerty, Nicholas J Ward.   

Abstract

PROBLEM: The prevalence of automobile drivers talking on cell phones is growing, but the effect of that behavior on driving performance is unclear. Also unclear is the relationship between the difficulty level of a phone conversation and the resulting distraction.
METHOD: This study used a driving simulator to determine the effect that easy and difficult cell phone conversations have on driving performance.
RESULTS: Cell phone use caused participants to have higher variation in accelerator pedal position, drive more slowly with more variation in speed, and report a higher level of workload regardless of conversation difficulty level.
CONCLUSIONS: Drivers may cope with the additional stress of phone conversations by enduring higher workloads or setting reduced performance goals. IMPACT ON INDUSTRY: Because an increasing number of people talk on the phone while driving, crashes caused by distracted drivers using cell phones will cause disruptions in business, as well as injury, disability, and permanent loss of personnel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15474548     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2004.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Safety Res        ISSN: 0022-4375


  19 in total

1.  Driving after pediatric traumatic brain injury: Impact of distraction and executive functioning.

Authors:  Megan E Narad; Patrick Nalepka; Aimee E Miley; Dean W Beebe; Brad G Kurowski; Shari L Wade
Journal:  Rehabil Psychol       Date:  2020-06-11

2.  Distracted Driving in Teens With and Without Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Authors:  Despina Stavrinos; Annie A Garner; Crystal A Franklin; Haley D Johnson; Sharon C Welburn; Russell Griffin; Andrea T Underhill; Philip R Fine
Journal:  J Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 2.145

3.  Social and Non-social Hazard Response in Drivers with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Haley Johnson Bishop; Fred J Biasini; Despina Stavrinos
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2017-04

Review 4.  Associations between driving performance and engaging in secondary tasks: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alva O Ferdinand; Nir Menachemi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Prevalence of and factors associated with distraction among public transit bus drivers.

Authors:  Russell Griffin; Carrie Huisingh; Gerald McGwin
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.491

6.  Effects of auditory training on low-pass filtered speech perception and listening-related cognitive load.

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski; Alexandria C Zakrzewski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Digital haptics improve speed of visual search performance in a dual-task setting.

Authors:  Ruxandra I Tivadar; Rebecca C Arnold; Nora Turoman; Jean-François Knebel; Micah M Murray
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Interference between conversation and a concurrent visuomotor task.

Authors:  Timothy W Boiteau; Patrick S Malone; Sara A Peters; Amit Almor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2013-02-18

9.  Effects of mobile Internet use on college student pedestrian injury risk.

Authors:  Katherine W Byington; David C Schwebel
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2012-11-30

10.  Impact of distraction on the driving performance of adolescents with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Megan Narad; Annie A Garner; Anne A Brassell; Dyani Saxby; Tanya N Antonini; Kathleen M O'Brien; Leanne Tamm; Gerald Matthews; Jeffery N Epstein
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 16.193

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.