Literature DB >> 24433192

Prevalence of and factors associated with distraction among public transit bus drivers.

Russell Griffin1, Carrie Huisingh, Gerald McGwin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recent research has suggested that driver distraction is a major cause of driving performance impairment and motor vehicle collisions. Research on the topic has focused on passenger vehicles, with studies suggesting that drivers may be distracted nearly 33 percent of the time spent driving. To date, no study has examined the prevalence of distraction specifically among public transit bus drivers.
METHODS: Over a 3-month period, trained investigators observed and recorded distraction behaviors of bus drivers. Distraction prevalence was compared by route characteristics (e.g., geographic area, travel speed) using chi-square test. A general estimating equation logistic regression was used to estimate P values for distraction prevalence by driver demographics.
RESULTS: Overall, there was a 39 percent prevalence of distraction. The most prevalent distractions were due to interactions with another passenger. Distractions were more prevalent among drivers <30 years of age or ≥ 50 years of age, on city streets or highways (relative to residential streets), and when there were more than 20 passengers. Distractions were the least prevalent in suburban areas, with the highest prevalence observed in city centers and rural areas.
CONCLUSIONS: Driver distraction is a common problem for public transit bus drivers, mainly due to other passengers. Drivers should be educated on the hazards of distracted driving and on ways to avoid distraction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bus; distraction; driver; prevalence; public transit

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24433192      PMCID: PMC4391701          DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2013.867482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev        ISSN: 1538-9588            Impact factor:   1.491


  18 in total

1.  Cellular telephones and driving performance: the effects of attentional demands on motor vehicle crash risk.

Authors:  James Hunton; Jacob M Rose
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Profiles in driver distraction: effects of cell phone conversations on younger and older drivers.

Authors:  David L Strayer; Frank A Drews
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.888

3.  Engrossed in conversation: the impact of cell phones on simulated driving performance.

Authors:  Kristen E Beede; Steven J Kass
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2005-11-28

4.  Driver's exposure to distractions in their natural driving environment.

Authors:  Jane Stutts; John Feaganes; Donald Reinfurt; Eric Rodgman; Charles Hamlett; Kenneth Gish; Loren Staplin
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2005-07-11

5.  The effect of distractions on the crash types of teenage drivers.

Authors:  David M Neyens; Linda Ng Boyle
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2006-09-22

6.  The influence of driver distraction on the severity of injuries sustained by teenage drivers and their passengers.

Authors:  David M Neyens; Linda Ng Boyle
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2007-07-16

Review 7.  Is a hands-free phone safer than a handheld phone?

Authors:  Yoko Ishigami; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2009-04-09

8.  Passenger and cell phone conversations in simulated driving.

Authors:  Frank A Drews; Monisha Pasupathi; David L Strayer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2008-12

9.  A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance.

Authors:  Jeff K Caird; Chelsea R Willness; Piers Steel; Chip Scialfa
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2008-02-25

10.  An assessment of commercial motor vehicle driver distraction using naturalistic driving data.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Hickman; Richard J Hanowski
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.491

View more
  3 in total

1.  Working Conditions, Job Strain, and Traffic Safety among Three Groups of Public Transport Drivers.

Authors:  Sergio A Useche; Viviola Gómez; Boris Cendales; Francisco Alonso
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2018-02-02

2.  Relationship Between the Incidence of Road Traffic Accidents, Psychological Characteristics, and Genotype in Bus Drivers in a Chinese Population.

Authors:  Xiaomin Wang; Yukun Zuo; Hu Jiang; Li Yang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-08-10

Review 3.  Multi-sensor movement analysis for transport safety and health applications.

Authors:  Katarzyna Sila-Nowicka; Piyushimita Thakuriah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.