BACKGROUND: To the authors' knowledge, the natural history of disease progression to distant metastasis is unknown in men who fail to achieve an undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP),. The authors assessed the clinical outcome of men with a persistently detectable PSA level after RRP for clinically localized prostate carcinoma. METHODS: Between 1989 and 2002, 160 men failed to achieve an undetectable PSA level (>/= 0.1 ng/mL) after undergoing RRP for clinically localized prostate carcinoma. No patient received adjuvant therapy before documented metastasis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate distant metastasis-free survival. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the ability of clinical and pathologic variables to predict distant metastasis-free survival. RESULTS: The probability of distant metastasis-free survival at 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years was reported to be 68%, 49%, and 22%, respectively. Seventy-five men (47%) developed distant metastases after RRP (median time to metastases of 5.0 years; range, 0.5-13 years). The combination of RRP Gleason score, seminal vesicle status, and lymph node status resulted in 3 risk groups for the prediction of distant metastasis-free survival (hazards ratio [HR] = 1.6; P < 0.01). The slope of PSA changes approximately 3-12 months after RRP at a cutoff value >/= 0.05 was found to be even more predictive of distant metastasis-free survival (HR = 2.9; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Many patients remained free of metastatic disease for an extended period despite failing to achieve an undetectable PSA level after undergoing RRP for clinically localized prostate carcinoma. However, other patients experienced rapid disease progression to distant metastasis. The authors defined clinical (PSA slope) and pathologic (Gleason score) prognostic variables to help identify those patients with a higher risk of developing distant metastasis after undergoing RRP. (c) 2004 American Cancer Society
BACKGROUND: To the authors' knowledge, the natural history of disease progression to distant metastasis is unknown in men who fail to achieve an undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP),. The authors assessed the clinical outcome of men with a persistently detectable PSA level after RRP for clinically localized prostate carcinoma. METHODS: Between 1989 and 2002, 160 men failed to achieve an undetectable PSA level (>/= 0.1 ng/mL) after undergoing RRP for clinically localized prostate carcinoma. No patient received adjuvant therapy before documented metastasis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate distant metastasis-free survival. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the ability of clinical and pathologic variables to predict distant metastasis-free survival. RESULTS: The probability of distant metastasis-free survival at 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years was reported to be 68%, 49%, and 22%, respectively. Seventy-five men (47%) developed distant metastases after RRP (median time to metastases of 5.0 years; range, 0.5-13 years). The combination of RRP Gleason score, seminal vesicle status, and lymph node status resulted in 3 risk groups for the prediction of distant metastasis-free survival (hazards ratio [HR] = 1.6; P < 0.01). The slope of PSA changes approximately 3-12 months after RRP at a cutoff value >/= 0.05 was found to be even more predictive of distant metastasis-free survival (HR = 2.9; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Many patients remained free of metastatic disease for an extended period despite failing to achieve an undetectable PSA level after undergoing RRP for clinically localized prostate carcinoma. However, other patients experienced rapid disease progression to distant metastasis. The authors defined clinical (PSA slope) and pathologic (Gleason score) prognostic variables to help identify those patients with a higher risk of developing distant metastasis after undergoing RRP. (c) 2004 American Cancer Society
Authors: François Audenet; Elise Seringe; Sarah J Drouin; Eva Comperat; Olivier Cussenot; Marc-Olivier Bitker; Morgan Rouprêt Journal: World J Urol Date: 2011-06-03 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: W S A Smellie; J Forth; S Sundar; E Kalu; C A M McNulty; E Sherriff; I D Watson; C Croucher; T M Reynolds; P J Carey Journal: J Clin Pathol Date: 2006-05-19 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Rohan Nandurkar; Pimmeke van Leeuwen; Phillip Stricker; Henry Woo; Rajdeep Kooner; Carlo Yuen; Gordon O'Neill; David Ende; Thomas Cusick; Bao Ho; Adam Hickey; Louise Emmett Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2019-01-23 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Stephanie L Skove; Lauren E Howard; William J Aronson; Martha K Terris; Christopher J Kane; Christopher L Amling; Matthew R Cooperberg; Daniel M Moreira; Stephen J Freedland Journal: Urology Date: 2017-07-19 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Anup Kumar; Srinivas Samavedi; Vladimir Mouraviev; Anthony S Bates; Rafael F Coelho; Bernardo Rocco; Vipul R Patel Journal: J Robot Surg Date: 2016-05-31
Authors: Christopher Darr; Nina N Harke; Jan Philipp Radtke; Leubet Yirga; Claudia Kesch; Maarten R Grootendorst; Wolfgang P Fendler; Pedro Fragoso Costa; Christoph Rischpler; Christine Praus; Johannes Haubold; Henning Reis; Thomas Hager; Ken Herrmann; Ina Binse; Boris Hadaschik Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2020-02-14 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Yu Chi Yang; Labros G Meimetis; Amy H Tien; Nasrin R Mawji; Gavin Carr; Jun Wang; Raymond J Andersen; Marianne D Sadar Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2013-02-26 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Tammy Ho; Leah Gerber; William J Aronson; Martha K Terris; Joseph C Presti; Christopher J Kane; Christopher L Amling; Stephen J Freedland Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2012-08-20 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Rubén Algarra; Mateo Hevia; Antonio Tienza; Imanol Merino; José María Velis; Javier Zudaire; José Enrique Robles; Ignacio Pascual Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: S García-Barreras; F Rozet; I Nunes-Silva; V Srougi; R Sanchez-Salas; E Barret; M Galiano; X Cathelineau Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2017-12-14 Impact factor: 3.405