Literature DB >> 15467544

Rising cesarean rates: are patients sicker?

Jennifer L Bailit1, Thomas E Love, Brian Mercer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our study explored if patient risk factors for cesarean delivery (CD) are changing over time. STUDY
DESIGN: North Carolina birth certificates from 1995 were used to build a logistic regression model to predict the probability of primary CD. The model estimated each patient's probability of primary CD for 4 years of deliveries (397,793). The percentage of the population in each of the 10 CD risk deciles were compared across years.
RESULTS: The incidence of primary CD rose from 16.6 to 18.4 (P<.0001). Despite this increase over time, more women were low risk (probability of CD <10%) (43.2% to 46.4%, P<.0001). The cesarean rate even rose for women in the lowest risk group (4.6% to 5.9%, P<.0001).
CONCLUSION: The rate of primary CD is increasing, despite improvements in patient risk profile. The increasing CD rate may result from changes in physician behavior, institutional factors, and increasing patient demand for elective cesarean delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15467544     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  19 in total

1.  Is planned cesarean childbirth a safe alternative?

Authors:  B Anthony Armson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  The influence of detailed maternal ethnicity on cesarean delivery: findings from the U.S. birth certificate in the State of Massachusetts.

Authors:  Joyce K Edmonds; Summer S Hawkins; Bruce B Cohen
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 3.689

3.  Primary and Repeat Cesarean Deliveries: A Population-based Study in the United States, 1979-2010.

Authors:  Cande V Ananth; Alexander M Friedman; Katherine M Keyes; Jessica A Lavery; Ava Hamilton; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Obstetrical intervention and the singleton preterm birth rate in the United States from 1991-2006.

Authors:  Marian F MacDorman; Eugene Declercq; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Cesarean delivery rates vary tenfold among US hospitals; reducing variation may address quality and cost issues.

Authors:  Katy Backes Kozhimannil; Michael R Law; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  The association between increased use of labor induction and reduced rate of cesarean delivery.

Authors:  James M Nicholson; Peter Cronholm; Lisa C Kellar; Morghan H Stenson; George A Macones
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 7.  Misoprostol to reduce intraoperative and postoperative hemorrhage during cesarean delivery: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

Authors:  Agustín Conde-Agudelo; Aníbal Nieto; Anyeli Rosas-Bermudez; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Exercise during pregnancy and cesarean delivery: North Carolina PRAMS, 2004-2005.

Authors:  Marit L Bovbjerg; Anna Maria Siega-Riz
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.689

9.  Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop.

Authors:  Catherine Y Spong; Vincenzo Berghella; Katharine D Wenstrom; Brian M Mercer; George R Saade
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 10.  Management of pain associated with the insertion of intrauterine contraceptives.

Authors:  K Gemzell-Danielsson; D Mansour; C Fiala; A M Kaunitz; L Bahamondes
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 15.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.