Literature DB >> 15461450

Narrowing substrate specificity in a directly evolved enzyme: the A293D mutant of aspartate aminotransferase.

Margaret A Chow1, Kathryn E McElroy, Kevin D Corbett, James M Berger, Jack F Kirsch.   

Abstract

Several mutant Escherichia coli aspartate aminotransferases (eAATases) have been characterized in the attempt to evolve or rationally redesign the substrate specificity of eAATase into that of E. coli tyrosine aminotransferase (eTATase). These include HEX (designed), HEX + A293D (design followed by directed evolution), and SRHEPT (directed evolution). The A293D mutation realized from directed evolution of HEX is here imported into the SRHEPT platform by site-directed mutagenesis, resulting in an enzyme (SRHEPT + A293D) with nearly the same ratio of k(cat)/K(m)(Phe) to k(cat)/K(m)(Asp) as that of wild-type eTATase. The A293D substitution is an important specificity determinant; it selectively disfavors interactions with dicarboxylic substrates and inhibitors compared to aromatic ones. Context dependence analysis is generalized to provide quantitative comparisons of a common substitution in two or more different protein scaffolds. High-resolution crystal structures of ligand complexes of HEX + A293D, SRHEPT, and SRHEPT + A293D were determined. We find that in both SRHEPT + A293D and HEX + A293D, the additional mutation holds the Arg 292 side chain away from the active site to allow increased specificity for phenylalanine over aspartate. The resulting movement of Arg 292 allows greater flexibility of the small domain in HEX + A293D. While HEX is always in the closed conformation, HEX + A293D is observed in both the closed and a novel open conformation, allowing for more rapid product release.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15461450     DOI: 10.1021/bi0487544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  9 in total

1.  Engineering homooligomeric proteins to detect weak intersite allosteric communication: aminotransferases, a case study.

Authors:  Edgar Deu; Jack F Kirsch
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Kinetics of regulatory serine variants of tyrosine hydroxylase with cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase and extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase 2.

Authors:  Montserrat Royo; S Colette Daubner
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2006-02-14

3.  Specificity and cooperativity at β-lactamase position 104 in TEM-1/BLIP and SHV-1/BLIP interactions.

Authors:  Melinda S Hanes; Kimberly A Reynolds; Case McNamara; Partho Ghosh; Robert A Bonomo; Jack F Kirsch; Tracy M Handel
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-02-03

4.  Recombinant expression of twelve evolutionarily diverse subfamily Ialpha aminotransferases.

Authors:  Kathryn E Muratore; John R Srouji; Margaret A Chow; Jack F Kirsch
Journal:  Protein Expr Purif       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 1.650

5.  Histidine 282 in 5-aminolevulinate synthase affects substrate binding and catalysis.

Authors:  Tracy D Turbeville; Junshun Zhang; Gregory A Hunter; Gloria C Ferreira
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Janus: prediction and ranking of mutations required for functional interconversion of enzymes.

Authors:  Trevor A Addington; Robert W Mertz; Justin B Siegel; James M Thompson; Andrew J Fisher; Vladimir Filkov; Nicholas M Fleischman; Alisa A Suen; Chensong Zhang; Michael D Toney
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Structural insights into substrate specificity in variants of N-acetylneuraminic Acid lyase produced by directed evolution.

Authors:  Ivan Campeotto; Amanda H Bolt; Thomas A Harman; Caitriona Dennis; Chi H Trinh; Simon E V Phillips; Adam Nelson; Arwen R Pearson; Alan Berry
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  CSAR benchmark exercise of 2010: combined evaluation across all submitted scoring functions.

Authors:  Richard D Smith; James B Dunbar; Peter Man-Un Ung; Emilio X Esposito; Chao-Yie Yang; Shaomeng Wang; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  A kinetic model of the central carbon metabolism for acrylic acid production in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Alexandre Oliveira; Joana Rodrigues; Eugénio Campos Ferreira; Lígia Rodrigues; Oscar Dias
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 4.475

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.