Literature DB >> 15456949

Capecitabine monotherapy in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer.

S-H Lee1, J Lee, J Park, S H Park, K-E Lee, S I Lee, E Nam, J O Park, K Kim, C W Jung, Y S Park, S S Yoon, W K Kang, M H Lee, K Park, Y-H Im.   

Abstract

The selection of chemotherapeutic regimens is challenging for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients whose diseases have failed to respond to anthracyline and taxane. Capecitabine has advantages of oral administration and favorable toxicity profiles. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of capecitabine and to identify the subgroup of patients who would potentially have benefit from capecitabine monotherapy in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated MBC. Female patients with MBC who had been previously treated with anthracycline and taxane received oral capecitabine 2500 mg/m(2) divided in two doses daily for 2 wk with 1-wk rest period. Between September, 1999, and December, 2002, a total of 38 patients were enrolled. Among the 36 evaluable patients, one patient achieved a complete response (CR), 9 patients had partial responses (PRs), and 13 patients had stable diseases (SDs). Response rate was 26% [95% confidence interval (CI), 12-40%] and the tumor control rate (TCR, CR+PR+SD) was 61% (95% CI, 45-77%). The median follow-up duration was 27.8 mo. The median duration of response was 8.9 mo, the median time to progression was 4.6 mo, and the median overall survival was 18.1 mo. The major toxicities were hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, and emesis. There was no treatment-related death. The predictors of better overall survival were positivity of hormone receptor, disease-free survival longer than 1 yr, non-refractoriness to anthracycline, and fewer number (<or= 3) of involved organs. Capecitabine monotherapy is effective and well tolerated for MBC patients who had previously been treated with anthracycline and taxane. The TCR could predict overall survival as well as the objective response in this study, suggesting a possible role of TCR as a surrogate marker for survival in MBC patients on salvage chemotherapy. The patients who have relatively slow growing tumor and less tumor burden could have benefit from capecitabine monotherapy following anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15456949     DOI: 10.1385/MO:21:3:223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  15 in total

Review 1.  Chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer-report of a European expert panel.

Authors:  John Crown; Véronique Diéras; Manfred Kaufmann; Gunter von Minckwitz; Stan Kaye; Robert Leonard; Michel Marty; Jean-Louis Misset; Bruno Osterwalder; Martine Piccart
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Dose-intensive vinorelbine with concurrent granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in paclitaxel-refractory metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  R B Livingston; G K Ellis; J R Gralow; M A Williams; R White; C McGuirt; B B Adamkiewicz; C A Long
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Weekly vinorelbine is an effective palliative regimen after failure with anthracyclines and taxanes in metastatic breast carcinoma.

Authors:  L Zelek; S Barthier; M Riofrio; K Fizazi; O Rixe; J P Delord; A Le Cesne; M Spielmann
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Multicenter, Phase II study of capecitabine in taxane-pretreated metastatic breast carcinoma patients.

Authors:  J L Blum; V Dieras; P M Lo Russo; J Horton; O Rutman; A Buzdar; B Osterwalder
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Phase II study of weekly gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer relapsing or failing both an anthracycline and a taxane.

Authors:  C H Smorenburg; M Bontenbal; C Seynaeve; C van Zuylen; G de Heus; J Verweij; R de Wit
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  S Chan; K Friedrichs; D Noel; T Pintér; S Van Belle; D Vorobiof; R Duarte; M Gil Gil; I Bodrogi; E Murray; L Yelle; G von Minckwitz; S Korec; P Simmonds; F Buzzi; R González Mancha; G Richardson; E Walpole; M Ronzoni; M Murawsky; M Alakl; A Riva; J Crown
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Patient preferences for oral versus intravenous palliative chemotherapy.

Authors:  G Liu; E Franssen; M I Fitch; E Warner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Vinorelbine-induced neurotoxicity in patients with advanced breast cancer pretreated with paclitaxel--a phase II study.

Authors:  B Fazeny; U Zifko; S Meryn; H Huber; W Grisold; C Dittrich
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 9.  Monotherapy options in the management of metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Andrew D Seidman
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.929

10.  Multicenter phase II study of oral capecitabine (Xeloda(")) in patients with metastatic breast cancer relapsing after treatment with a taxane-containing therapy.

Authors:  P Reichardt; G Von Minckwitz; P C Thuss-Patience; W Jonat; H Kölbl; F Jänicke; D G Kieback; W Kuhn; A E Schindler; S Mohrmann; M Kaufmann; H J Lück
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  A comparison of toxicity profiles between the lower and standard dose capecitabine in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tomohiro F Nishijima; Maya Suzuki; Hyman B Muss
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  RESILIENCE: Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind Trial Comparing Sorafenib With Capecitabine Versus Placebo With Capecitabine in Locally Advanced or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  José Baselga; Claudio Zamagni; Patricia Gómez; Begoña Bermejo; Shigenori E Nagai; Bohuslav Melichar; Arlene Chan; Lászlo Mángel; Jonas Bergh; Frederico Costa; Henry L Gómez; William J Gradishar; Clifford A Hudis; Bernardo L Rapoport; Henri Roché; Patricia Maeda; Liping Huang; Gerold Meinhardt; Joshua Zhang; Lee S Schwartzberg
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Features of durable response and treatment efficacy for capecitabine monotherapy in advanced breast cancer: real-world evidence from a large single-centre cohort.

Authors:  S Thijssen; H Wildiers; K Punie; B Beuselinck; P Clement; C Remmerie; P Berteloot; S Han; E Van Nieuwenhuysen; T Van Gorp; I Vergote; A Smeets; I Nevelsteen; G Floris; C Weltens; J Menten; H Janssen; A Laenen; P Neven
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Phase II study of gemcitabine and carboplatin in metastatic breast cancers with prior exposure to anthracyclines and taxanes.

Authors:  Daniel Chan; Wee-Lee Yeo; Maricel Tiemsim Cordero; Chiung-Ing Wong; Benjamin Chuah; Ross Soo; Sing-Huang Tan; Siew-Eng Lim; Boon-Cher Goh; Soo-Chin Lee
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 3.850

5.  A Phase II trial of the combination of vinorelbine and capecitabine as second-line treatment in metastatic breast cancer previously treated with taxanes and/or anthracyclines.

Authors:  George Orphanos; Athanasios Alexopoulos; Savvoula Malliou; George Ioannidis; Alexandros Ardavanis; Constantinos Kandylis; John Stavrakakis; Gerassimos Rigatos
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Randomised phase II trial of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine vs gemcitabine plus cisplatin vs gemcitabine plus capecitabine in patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  H J Stemmler; D diGioia; W Freier; H W Tessen; G Gitsch; W Jonat; W Brugger; E Kettner; W Abenhardt; H Tesch; H J Hurtz; S Rösel; O Brudler; V Heinemann
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Reversible severe fatty liver induced by capecitabine: A case report.

Authors:  Yiyan Jiang; Qiancheng He; Suxia Li; Chang Shi; Xiaolei Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  The prognostic values of CYP2B6 genetic polymorphisms and metastatic sites for advanced breast cancer patients treated with docetaxel and thiotepa.

Authors:  Qingkun Song; Xinna Zhou; Jing Yu; Ningning Dong; Xiaoli Wang; Huabing Yang; Jun Ren; H Kim Lyerly
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Neo-adjuvant capecitabine chemotherapy in women with newly diagnosed locally advanced breast cancer in a resource-poor setting (Nigeria): efficacy and safety in a phase II feasibility study.

Authors:  Olukayode A Arowolo; Uchenna O Njiaju; Temidayo O Ogundiran; Oyewale Abidoye; Olukayode O Lawal; Millicent Obajimi; Adebayo V Adetiloye; Hae K Im; Akinbolaji A Akinkuolie; Abideen Oluwasola; Kayode Adelusola; Adesunkanmi A Kayode; Augustine E Agbakwuru; Helen Oduntan; Chinedum P Babalola; Gini Fleming; Olusola C Olopade; Adeyinka Gladys Falusi; Muheez A Durosinmi; Olufunmilayo I Olopade
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 2.431

10.  Phase I dose-finding study of eribulin and capecitabine for metastatic breast cancer: JBCRG-18 cape study.

Authors:  Masaya Hattori; Hiroshi Ishiguro; Norikazu Masuda; Akiyo Yoshimura; Shoichiro Ohtani; Hiroyuki Yasojima; Satoshi Morita; Shinji Ohno; Hiroji Iwata
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.239

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.