BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are usually exposed to both anthracyclines and taxanes during neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment of primary breast cancer or during initial therapy of MBC. We investigate the combination of gemcitabine and carboplatin in MBC with prior exposure to both anthracyclines and taxanes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MBC patients previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes were enrolled in a single tertiary center phase II study. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2) I.V on days 1 and 8) and carboplatin (AUC 5 I.V on day 1) administered every 3 weeks. Results 41 patients were recruited. Objective response rate was 39% including 1 complete response (2%) and 15 partial responses (37%). Twelve patients (29%) had stable disease. Median time to progression was 4.6 months (95% CI 3.3-5.9 months) and median overall survival 10.5 months (95% CI 7.6-13.4 months). Grade 3 & 4 hematological toxicities included neutropenia (58%), febrile neutropenia (15%), anemia (12%) and thrombocytopenia (49%), including 7% who required platelet transfusions. Non-hematological toxicity was rarely severe. 56% of patients required at least one dose reduction; the mean relative dose intensity for gemcitabine and carboplatin were 0.82 (range 0.5-1.0) and 0.95 (range 0.75-1.00) respectively, with no difference in dose intensity between responders and non-responders. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine combined with carboplatin has promising efficacy in MBC with prior treatment with anthracyclines and taxanes but has significant haematological toxicities requiring dose modifications. The regimen may be modified to gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8 to improve tolerability.
BACKGROUND:Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are usually exposed to both anthracyclines and taxanes during neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment of primary breast cancer or during initial therapy of MBC. We investigate the combination of gemcitabine and carboplatin in MBC with prior exposure to both anthracyclines and taxanes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MBCpatients previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes were enrolled in a single tertiary center phase II study. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2) I.V on days 1 and 8) and carboplatin (AUC 5 I.V on day 1) administered every 3 weeks. Results 41 patients were recruited. Objective response rate was 39% including 1 complete response (2%) and 15 partial responses (37%). Twelve patients (29%) had stable disease. Median time to progression was 4.6 months (95% CI 3.3-5.9 months) and median overall survival 10.5 months (95% CI 7.6-13.4 months). Grade 3 & 4 hematological toxicities included neutropenia (58%), febrile neutropenia (15%), anemia (12%) and thrombocytopenia (49%), including 7% who required platelet transfusions. Non-hematological toxicity was rarely severe. 56% of patients required at least one dose reduction; the mean relative dose intensity for gemcitabine and carboplatin were 0.82 (range 0.5-1.0) and 0.95 (range 0.75-1.00) respectively, with no difference in dose intensity between responders and non-responders. CONCLUSION:Gemcitabine combined with carboplatin has promising efficacy in MBC with prior treatment with anthracyclines and taxanes but has significant haematological toxicities requiring dose modifications. The regimen may be modified to gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8 to improve tolerability.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: J A Oshaughnessy; J Blum; V Moiseyenko; S E Jones; D Miles; D Bell; R Rosso; L Mauriac; B Osterwalder; H U Burger; S Laws Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Jae Hong Seo; Sang Cheul Oh; Cheul Won Choi; Byung Soo Kim; Sang Won Shin; Yeul Hong Kim; Jun Suk Kim; Ae-Ree Kim; Jae-Bok Lee; Bum Hwan Koo Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2006-06-09 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: V Heinemann; H J Stemmler; A Wohlrab; D Bosse; C Losem; S Kahlert; G Rauthe Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2005-09-15 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Fady L Nasr; George Y Chahine; Joseph G Kattan; Fadi S Farhat; Walid T Mokaddem; Elias A Tueni; Joya E Dagher; Marwan G Ghosn Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: D Laessig; H J Stemmler; U Vehling-Kaiser; P A Fasching; F Melchert; H Kolbl; M Stauch; P Maubach; A Scharl; G Morack; H Meerpohl; B Weber; B Kalischefski; V Heinemann Journal: Oncology Date: 2008-06-02 Impact factor: 2.935
Authors: Jian Yuan Goh; Min Feng; Wenyu Wang; Gokce Oguz; Siti Maryam J M Yatim; Puay Leng Lee; Yi Bao; Tse Hui Lim; Panpan Wang; Wai Leong Tam; Annette R Kodahl; Maria B Lyng; Suman Sarma; Selena Y Lin; Alexander Lezhava; Yoon Sim Yap; Alvin S T Lim; Dave S B Hoon; Henrik J Ditzel; Soo Chin Lee; Ern Yu Tan; Qiang Yu Journal: Nat Med Date: 2017-09-25 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Gabriel Rinnerthaler; Simon Peter Gampenrieder; Andreas Petzer; Sonja Burgstaller; David Fuchs; Dieter Rossmann; Marija Balic; Daniel Egle; Holger Rumpold; Christian F Singer; Rupert Bartsch; Edgar Petru; Thomas Melchardt; Hanno Ulmer; Brigitte Mlineritsch; Richard Greil Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-11-06 Impact factor: 4.430