BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that minichromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins (Mcm2-7) may be useful proliferation markers in dysplasia and cancer in various tissues. AIMS: To investigate the use of Mcm7 as a proliferation marker in 79 lymph node negative prostate cancers and compare it with Ki-67, a commonly used cell proliferation marker. METHODS: The percentage of proliferating cells (proliferation index; PI) was calculated for basal and luminal epithelial cells in benign prostate tissue, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), and epithelial cells in adenocarcinoma. The PI for each biomarker was correlated with the preoperative prostate specific antigen concentration, the Gleason score, surgical resection margin status, and the AJCC pT stage for each patient. RESULTS: The mean PIs for Ki-67 and Mcm7 were: benign luminal epithelium 0.7 and 1.2 and benign basal epithelium 0.8 and 8.2; PIN non-basal epithelium 4.9 and 10.6 and PIN basal epithelium 0.7 and 3.1; adenocarcinoma 9.8 and 22.7, respectively. Mcm7 had a significantly higher mean PI (p<0.0001) than Ki-67 for all cell categories except benign luminal epithelial cells. Mcm7 was a better discriminatory marker of proliferation between benign epithelium, PIN, and invasive adenocarcinoma (p<0.0001) than Ki-67. The drop in Mcm7 mean basal cell PI from benign epithelium to PIN epithelium was significantly larger than for Ki-67 (p<0.0001). Mcm7 had a significantly higher PI than Ki-67 at each risk level. CONCLUSION: Mcm7 may be a useful proliferation marker in prostatic neoplasia and warrants further evaluation as a complementary tool in the diagnosis of PIN and prostate carcinoma.
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that minichromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins (Mcm2-7) may be useful proliferation markers in dysplasia and cancer in various tissues. AIMS: To investigate the use of Mcm7 as a proliferation marker in 79 lymph node negative prostate cancers and compare it with Ki-67, a commonly used cell proliferation marker. METHODS: The percentage of proliferating cells (proliferation index; PI) was calculated for basal and luminal epithelial cells in benign prostate tissue, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), and epithelial cells in adenocarcinoma. The PI for each biomarker was correlated with the preoperative prostate specific antigen concentration, the Gleason score, surgical resection margin status, and the AJCC pT stage for each patient. RESULTS: The mean PIs for Ki-67 and Mcm7 were: benign luminal epithelium 0.7 and 1.2 and benign basal epithelium 0.8 and 8.2; PIN non-basal epithelium 4.9 and 10.6 and PIN basal epithelium 0.7 and 3.1; adenocarcinoma 9.8 and 22.7, respectively. Mcm7 had a significantly higher mean PI (p<0.0001) than Ki-67 for all cell categories except benign luminal epithelial cells. Mcm7 was a better discriminatory marker of proliferation between benign epithelium, PIN, and invasive adenocarcinoma (p<0.0001) than Ki-67. The drop in Mcm7 mean basal cell PI from benign epithelium to PIN epithelium was significantly larger than for Ki-67 (p<0.0001). Mcm7 had a significantly higher PI than Ki-67 at each risk level. CONCLUSION:Mcm7 may be a useful proliferation marker in prostatic neoplasia and warrants further evaluation as a complementary tool in the diagnosis of PIN and prostate carcinoma.
Authors: D G Bostwick; D J Grignon; M E Hammond; M B Amin; M Cohen; D Crawford; M Gospadarowicz; R S Kaplan; D S Miller; R Montironi; T F Pajak; A Pollack; J R Srigley; J W Yarbro Journal: Arch Pathol Lab Med Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 5.534
Authors: K Stoeber; I Halsall; A Freeman; R Swinn; A Doble; L Morris; N Coleman; N Bullock; R A Laskey; C N Hales; G H Williams Journal: Lancet Date: 1999-10-30 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: D A Scalzo; B V Kallakury; R V Gaddipati; C E Sheehan; H M Keys; D Savage; J S Ross Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 1998-02 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: M V Meng; G D Grossfeld; G H Williams; S Dilworth; K Stoeber; T W Mulley; V Weinberg; P R Carroll; T D Tlsty Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Y Takasaki; T Kogure; K Takeuchi; K Kaneda; T Yano; K Hirokawa; S Hirose; T Shirai; H Hashimoto Journal: J Immunol Date: 2001-04-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: K Stoeber; T D Tlsty; L Happerfield; G A Thomas; S Romanov; L Bobrow; E D Williams; G H Williams Journal: J Cell Sci Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 5.285
Authors: Okay Saydam; Ozlem Senol; Tieneke B M Schaaij-Visser; Thang V Pham; Sander R Piersma; Anat O Stemmer-Rachamimov; Thomas Wurdinger; Saskia M Peerdeman; Connie R Jimenez Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Huajun Zhao; Yuan-Hung Lo; Li Ma; Susan E Waltz; Jerilyn K Gray; Mien-Chie Hung; Shao-Chun Wang Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Laura Poliseno; Leonardo Salmena; Luisa Riccardi; Alessandro Fornari; Min Sup Song; Robin M Hobbs; Paolo Sportoletti; Shorheh Varmeh; Ainara Egia; Giuseppe Fedele; Lucia Rameh; Massimo Loda; Pier Paolo Pandolfi Journal: Sci Signal Date: 2010-04-13 Impact factor: 8.192