Marie Lof1, Elisabet Forsum. 1. Division of Nutrition, Department of Biomedicine and Surgery, University of Linkoping, Linkoping, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Knowledge of the biological variability of the hydration factor (HF), ie, the ratio between total body water and fat-free mass, is important when calculating total body fat by means of the commonly used two-component model, which is based on estimates of body weight and total body water. The effect of pregnancy on the biological variability of HF, and consequently on the precision of the two-component model, is unknown. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to assess the effect of pregnancy on HF and its biological variability. DESIGN: HF was assessed in 33 women planning pregnancy and in 17 of these women during gestational weeks 14 and 32 and 2 wk postpartum. HF was calculated by using estimates of body weight, total body water obtained by means of deuterium dilution, and body volume measured by using underwater weighing. RESULTS: In the 17 women who became pregnant, HF was 0.718 +/- 0.023, 0.723 +/- 0.031, 0.747 +/- 0.017, and 0.734 +/- 0.020 before pregnancy, in gestational week 14, in gestational week 32, and 2 wk postpartum, respectively. The biological variability represented approximately 2% of average HF in the nonpregnant state. The corresponding figure was >3% in gestational week 14 but </=1.7% in gestational week 32. CONCLUSION: The two-component model for assessing body fat is as appropriate during late gestation as it is in the nonpregnant state, although its precision may be impaired when applied during the first part of pregnancy.
BACKGROUND: Knowledge of the biological variability of the hydration factor (HF), ie, the ratio between total body water and fat-free mass, is important when calculating total body fat by means of the commonly used two-component model, which is based on estimates of body weight and total body water. The effect of pregnancy on the biological variability of HF, and consequently on the precision of the two-component model, is unknown. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to assess the effect of pregnancy on HF and its biological variability. DESIGN: HF was assessed in 33 women planning pregnancy and in 17 of these women during gestational weeks 14 and 32 and 2 wk postpartum. HF was calculated by using estimates of body weight, total body water obtained by means of deuterium dilution, and body volume measured by using underwater weighing. RESULTS: In the 17 women who became pregnant, HF was 0.718 +/- 0.023, 0.723 +/- 0.031, 0.747 +/- 0.017, and 0.734 +/- 0.020 before pregnancy, in gestational week 14, in gestational week 32, and 2 wk postpartum, respectively. The biological variability represented approximately 2% of average HF in the nonpregnant state. The corresponding figure was >3% in gestational week 14 but </=1.7% in gestational week 32. CONCLUSION: The two-component model for assessing body fat is as appropriate during late gestation as it is in the nonpregnant state, although its precision may be impaired when applied during the first part of pregnancy.
Authors: Nicole E Marshall; Elizabeth J Murphy; Janet C King; E Kate Haas; Jeong Y Lim; Jack Wiedrick; Kent L Thornburg; Jonathan Q Purnell Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2016-02-17 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: André Dallmann; Ibrahim Ince; Michaela Meyer; Stefan Willmann; Thomas Eissing; Georg Hempel Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Anna Gradmark; Jeremy Pomeroy; Frida Renström; Susanne Steiginga; Margareta Persson; Antony Wright; Les Bluck; Magnus Domellöf; Steven E Kahn; Ingrid Mogren; Paul W Franks Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2011-06-16 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Saijuddin Shaikh; Kerry J Schulze; Hasmot Ali; Alain B Labrique; Abu Ahmed Shamim; Mahbubur Rashid; Sucheta Mehra; Parul Christian; Keith P West Journal: J Health Popul Nutr Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Jeremy Pomeroy; Frida Renström; Anna M Gradmark; Ingrid Mogren; Margareta Persson; Les Bluck; Antony Wright; Steven E Kahn; Magnus Domellöf; Paul W Franks Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-09-10 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Angela C Estampador; Jeremy Pomeroy; Frida Renström; Scott M Nelson; Ingrid Mogren; Margareta Persson; Naveed Sattar; Magnus Domellöf; Paul W Franks Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2014-03-12 Impact factor: 19.112