Literature DB >> 15446762

Redefining health technology assessment in Canada: diversification of products and contextualization of findings.

Pascale Lehoux1, Stéphanie Tailliez, Jean-Louis Denis, Myriam Hivon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: While strategies for enhancing the dissemination and impact of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) are now being increasingly examined, the characteristics of HTA production have received less attention.
METHODS: This study presents the results of a content analysis of the HTA documents (n = 187) produced by six Canadian agencies from 1995 to 2001, supplemented by interviews with chief executive officers and researchers (n = 40). The goal of this analysis was to characterize the agencies' portfolios and to analyze the challenges these agencies face in responding to the increased demand for HTA.
RESULTS: On average, thirty HTA products were issued annually by the agencies. While the bulk of documents produced were full HTA reports (76 percent), two agencies showed significant diversification in their products. Three agencies in particular actively supported the publication of results in scientific journals. Three agencies showed evidence of adapting to different institutional environments by specializing in certain areas (drugs, health services). Overall, a significant portion of the agencies' HTAs contained data on costs (37 percent) and effectiveness (48 percent), whereas ethical and social issues were rarely addressed (17 percent). Most agencies addressed issues and outcomes that did not strictly fall under the typical definition of HTA but that increased the "contextualization" of their findings.
CONCLUSIONS: Our discussion highlights four paradoxes and reflects further on challenges raised by the coordination of HTA within large countries and among European states. This study concludes that HTA is being redefined in Canada as HTA agencies offer a more contextualized informational basis, an approach that may prove more compatible with the increased demand for HTA.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15446762     DOI: 10.1017/s026646230400114x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  12 in total

1.  [Expensive drugs and intergenerational justice].

Authors:  David Hughes
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2010 May-Jun

2.  Ethical, legal, and social issues in health technology assessment for prenatal/preconceptional and newborn screening: a workshop report.

Authors:  B K Potter; D Avard; V Entwistle; C Kennedy; P Chakraborty; M McGuire; B J Wilson
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  Improving utility of evidence synthesis for healthy public policy: the three Rs (relevance, rigor, and readability [and resources]).

Authors:  Hilary Thomson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  How contexts and issues influence the use of policy-relevant research syntheses: a critical interpretive synthesis.

Authors:  Kaelan A Moat; John N Lavis; Julia Abelson
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  Engaging the public in priority-setting for health technology assessment: findings from a citizens' jury.

Authors:  Devidas Menon; Tania Stafinski
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews.

Authors:  Rebecca Ganann; Donna Ciliska; Helen Thomas
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  Ethical analysis to improve decision-making on health technologies.

Authors:  Samuli I Saarni; Bjørn Hofmann; Kristian Lampe; Dagmar Lühmann; Marjukka Mäkelä; Marcial Velasco-Garrido; Ilona Autti-Rämö
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 9.408

8.  Advancing knowledge of rapid reviews: an analysis of results, conclusions and recommendations from published review articles examining rapid reviews.

Authors:  Robin M Featherstone; Donna M Dryden; Michelle Foisy; Jeanne-Marie Guise; Matthew D Mitchell; Robin A Paynter; Karen A Robinson; Craig A Umscheid; Lisa Hartling
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-04-17

9.  Evidence-informed health policy 2 - survey of organizations that support the use of research evidence.

Authors:  John N Lavis; Elizabeth J Paulsen; Andrew D Oxman; Ray Moynihan
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Evidence-informed health policy 3 - interviews with the directors of organizations that support the use of research evidence.

Authors:  John N Lavis; Andrew D Oxman; Ray Moynihan; Elizabeth J Paulsen
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.