Literature DB >> 15446320

Tacrolimus or cyclosporine: which is the better partner for mycophenolate mofetil in heart transplant recipients?

Bruno M Meiser1, Jan Groetzner, Ingo Kaczmarek, Peter Landwehr, Markus Müller, Sebastian Jung, Peter Uberfuhr, Peter Fraunberger, Hans-Ulrich Stempfle, Michael Weis, Bruno Reichart.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this single-center study was to investigate whether trough level adjusted mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is more efficacious in combination with tacrolimus (TAC) or cyclosporine (CsA) and to evaluate the impact of either drug on MMF dosage.
METHODS: Sixty patients (TAC, n = 30; CsA, n = 30) undergoing heart transplantation were randomized into a prospective, open-label, controlled trial. Immunosuppression consisted of TAC or CsA in combination with MMF and corticosteroids. Target blood trough levels of TAC, CsA, and mycophenolic acid (MPA) were in the range of 10 to 15 ng/mL, 100 to 300 ng/mL, and 1.5 to 4.0 microg/mL, respectively. Acute rejection episodes (ARE); survival data; and adverse events with a special emphasis on infections, diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and the development of graft vessel disease (GVD) were recorded.
RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were well balanced. All patients were successfully withdrawn from corticosteroids within 6 months of transplant. Freedom from acute rejection was significantly higher (P = 0.0001) and the incidence of ARE per 100 patient days significantly lower in the TAC-MMF group than in the CsA-MMF group (0.03 vs. 0.15; P = 0.00007). Overall patient survival during follow-up was similar (93% vs. 90%). To achieve the targeted MPA blood levels, a significantly lower dose of MMF was required for TAC versus CsA patients. After a follow-up time of 2 years, the mean GVD score was 1.85 +/- 3.18 in the TAC-MMF group and 3.95 +/- 4.8 in the CsA-MMF group (P = 0.08).
CONCLUSIONS: At the selected doses and target levels for TAC and CsA used in this study, trough level adjusted MMF was more efficacious in combination with TAC for prevention of ARE. Furthermore, CsA patients need significantly more MMF to achieve similar MPA levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15446320     DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000129814.52456.25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  15 in total

Review 1.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mycophenolate in solid organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  Christine E Staatz; Susan E Tett
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetic optimization of immunosuppressive therapy in thoracic transplantation: part II.

Authors:  Caroline Monchaud; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetic optimization of immunosuppressive therapy in thoracic transplantation: part I.

Authors:  Caroline Monchaud; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  The direct and indirect allogeneic presentation pathway during acute rejection after human cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  N M van Besouw; J M Zuijderwijk; L M B Vaessen; A H M M Balk; A P W M Maat; P H van der Meide; W Weimar
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 5.  Tacrolimus versus cyclosporine as primary immunosuppression after heart transplantation: systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of randomised trials.

Authors:  Luit Penninga; Christian H Møller; Finn Gustafsson; Daniel A Steinbrüchel; Christian Gluud
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Infection rates in tacrolimus versus cyclosporine-treated pediatric kidney transplant recipients on a rapid discontinuation of prednisone protocol: 1-year analysis.

Authors:  Sarah J Kizilbash; Michelle N Rheault; Ananta Bangdiwala; Arthur Matas; Srinath Chinnakotla; Blanche M Chavers
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2017-03-31

7.  Population pharmacokinetics and dose optimization of mycophenolic acid in HCT recipients receiving oral mycophenolate mofetil.

Authors:  H Li; D E Mager; B M Sandmaier; D G Maloney; M J Bemer; J S McCune
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 3.126

Review 8.  Immunosuppressive therapy in older cardiac transplant patients.

Authors:  Arezu Zejnab Aliabadi; Andreas Oliver Zuckermann; Michael Grimm
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 9.  Coronary microvasculopathy in heart transplantation: Consequences and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Alessandra Vecchiati; Sara Tellatin; Annalisa Angelini; Sabino Iliceto; Francesco Tona
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2014-06-24

10.  Evolving concepts and treatment strategies for cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

Authors:  Rodolfo Denadai Benatti; David O Taylor
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.