Literature DB >> 1540967

Influence of chromatin structure on the induction of DNA double strand breaks by ionizing radiation.

M C Elia1, M O Bradley.   

Abstract

Pulsed field gel electrophoresis was used to examine the influence of chromatin structure on the induction of DNA double strand breaks by gamma-irradiation in CHO-WBL cells, nuclei, and a series of protein-depleted chromatin substrates. We developed a method to isolate intact nuclei in agarose plugs that avoids DNA shearing and nucleolytic degradation during sample preparation, and facilitates nuclear protein extraction. Agarose plug-isolated nuclei are extracted with increasing concentrations of NaCl to selectively strip off: (a) nonhistone chromosomal proteins (NHP); (b) NHP and histone H1; (c) NHP, H1, and histone H2A-H2B dimers; or (d) NHP, H1, and H2A-H2B dimers and histone H3-H4 tetramers. Following treatment with up to 40 Gy of gamma-radiation, DNA from each sample is purified and the relative induction of DNA double strand breaks is assayed by asymmetric field inversion gel electrophoresis. At a dose of 20 Gy, removal of nonhistone proteins from nuclei results in a 3-fold increase in DNA double strand breaks, compared to intact CHO cells. Additional stripping of histone H1 results in an incremental increase in double strand break induction, whereas further removal of H2A-H2B dimers yields a greater than 10-fold increase in DNA double strand breaks compared to intact CHO cells. The dose-response profile for this latter sample is similar to that observed for purified DNA. These data indicate that distinct classes of chromosomal proteins afford the DNA with different levels of protection against gamma-ray-induced DNA double strand breaks. Thus, chromatin domains that differ in tertiary structure and protein composition may also differ in their susceptibility to DNA double strand breaks induced by ionizing radiation and, perhaps, other clastogens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1540967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  23 in total

1.  Nucleosomes effectively shield DNA from radiation damage in living cells.

Authors:  Francesca Brambilla; Jose Manuel Garcia-Manteiga; Emanuele Monteleone; Lena Hoelzen; Angelica Zocchi; Alessandra Agresti; Marco E Bianchi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  p53 and the PWWP domain containing effector proteins in chromatin damage repair.

Authors:  Jing Hu; Yanming Wang
Journal:  Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2013-05-10

3.  Crosstalk between chromatin state and DNA damage response in cellular senescence and cancer.

Authors:  Gabriele Sulli; Raffaella Di Micco; Fabrizio d'Adda di Fagagna
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  In vitro micronucleus assay scored by flow cytometry provides a comprehensive evaluation of cytogenetic damage and cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Steven M Bryce; Jeffrey C Bemis; Svetlana L Avlasevich; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Induction of DNA-protein cross-links by Hippophae rhamnoides: implications in radioprotection and cytotoxicity.

Authors:  H C Goel; I Prem Kumar; Namita Samanta; S V S Rana
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.396

6.  Radiation Resistance in KRAS-Mutated Lung Cancer Is Enabled by Stem-like Properties Mediated by an Osteopontin-EGFR Pathway.

Authors:  Meng Wang; Jing Han; Lynnette Marcar; Josh Black; Qi Liu; Xiangyong Li; Kshithija Nagulapalli; Lecia V Sequist; Raymond H Mak; Cyril H Benes; Theodore S Hong; Kristin Gurtner; Mechthild Krause; Michael Baumann; Jing X Kang; Johnathan R Whetstine; Henning Willers
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 7.  Targeting chromatin to improve radiation response.

Authors:  M M Olcina; S O'Dell; E M Hammond
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  Histone variants: the tricksters of the chromatin world.

Authors:  Catherine Volle; Yamini Dalal
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 5.578

9.  Influence of alkyltransferase activity and chromosomal locus on mutational hotspots in Chinese hamster ovary cells.

Authors:  A Belouchi; M Ouimet; P Dion; N Gaudreault; W E Bradley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Modulation of chromatin organization by RH-3, a preparation of Hippophae rhamnoides, a possible role in radioprotection.

Authors:  I Prem Kumar; Samanta Namita; H C Goel
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.