Literature DB >> 12349895

Modulation of chromatin organization by RH-3, a preparation of Hippophae rhamnoides, a possible role in radioprotection.

I Prem Kumar1, Samanta Namita, H C Goel.   

Abstract

The present study was aimed to understand the mode of action of alcoholic extract of whole berries of Hippophae rhamnoides (RH-3) which has already been reported to render more than 80 % protection against radiation induced mortality in mice. Direct and indirect antioxidant action (free radical scavenging and metal chelating potential) were assayed using 2-deoxy ribose degradation and 2,2'-bipiridyl assays. Effect of RH-3 on radiation and chemical oxidant mediated DNA damage was evaluated using single cell gel electrophoresis (Comet assay) and alkaline halo assay. Ability of RH-3 to bind with calf thymus DNA was assayed through change in melting temperature (Tm) while toxicity was assayed in thymocytes by trypan blue exclusion. RH-3 inhibited 2-deoxy ribose degradation in a dose dependent manner (IC 50 approximately 500 microg/ml). 2,2'-bipiridyl assay revealed the inability of RH-3 to chelate Fe2+ ions. RH-3 inhibited radiation and tertiary butyl hydroperoxide induced DNA strand breaks in a dose dependent manner and at concentrations of 100 and 120 microg/ml the length of comet tail was considerably reduced and became almost similar to that of untreated control. RH-3 at a concentration of 120 pg/ml or more induced a strong compaction of chromatin as was evident from lack of tail and appearance of intensely stained circular bodies. This made the nuclei resistant even to a radiation dose of 1,000 Gy. The compaction of chromatin was not reversed even by relaxation buffer indicating that salt concentration had no role in RH-3 induced chromatin compaction. Alkaline halo assay also corroborated the results of comet assay. Lower DNA-RH-3 concentrations (1:0.5 and 1:1) induced a shift of Tm towards left by 2 and 5 degrees C respectively; however higher concentrations (1:8 and 1:16) shifted the Tm towards right increasing it by 10 and 21 degrees C correspondingly. RH-3, evinced only a mild free radical scavenging activity at concentrations used in the present study, therefore its ability to protect DNA could mainly be attributed to direct modulation of chromatin organization. Further work to unravel these facts would be necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12349895     DOI: 10.1023/a:1019905211392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem        ISSN: 0300-8177            Impact factor:   3.396


  26 in total

1.  Radioprotection against the formation of DNA double-strand breaks in cellular DNA but not native cellular chromatin by the polyamine spermine.

Authors:  S Chiu; N L Oleinick
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Radioprotective effects of antioxidative plant flavonoids in mice.

Authors:  K Shimoi; S Masuda; B Shen; M Furugori; N Kinae
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1996-02-19       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Radioprotective thiolamines WR-1065 and WR-33278 selectively denature nonhistone nuclear proteins.

Authors:  V K Booth; J C Roberts; R L Warters; B H Wilmore; J R Lepock
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 4.  Oxidative damage to DNA: formation, measurement, and biological significance.

Authors:  J Cadet; M Berger; T Douki; J L Ravanat
Journal:  Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.545

5.  Effect of polyamine-induced compaction and aggregation of DNA on the formation of radiation-induced strand breaks: quantitative models for cellular radiation damage.

Authors:  G L Newton; J A Aguilera; J F Ward; R C Fahey
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 6.  Radiation mutagenesis: the initial DNA lesions responsible.

Authors:  J F Ward
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Modifications of alkaline microgel electrophoresis for sensitive detection of DNA damage.

Authors:  N P Singh; R E Stephens; E L Schneider
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.694

8.  [Therapeutic endoscopy in combined therapy of gastroduodenal ulcers].

Authors:  V A Nikitin; A A Chistiakov; V I Bugaeva
Journal:  Khirurgiia (Mosk)       Date:  1989-04

9.  Radioprotection of human cell nuclear DNA by polyamines: radiosensitivity of chromatin is influenced by tightly bound spermine.

Authors:  R L Warters; G L Newton; P L Olive; R C Fahey
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Inhibition of topoisomerase II alpha activity in CHO K1 cells by 2-[(aminopropyl)amino]ethanethiol (WR-1065).

Authors:  D J Grdina; A Constantinou; N Shigematsu; J S Murley
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.841

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Modifying radiation damage.

Authors:  Kwanghee Kim; William H McBride
Journal:  Curr Drug Targets       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.465

2.  Immunomodulatory effects of seabuckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) against chromium (VI) induced immunosuppression.

Authors:  S Geetha; Vandana Singh; M Sai Ram; G Ilavazhagan; P K Banerjee; R C Sawhney
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.396

3.  Effects of traditional oriental medicines as anti-cytotoxic agents in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Wanyeon Kim; Jihoon Kang; Sungmin Lee; Buhyun Youn
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Induction of DNA-protein cross-links by Hippophae rhamnoides: implications in radioprotection and cytotoxicity.

Authors:  H C Goel; I Prem Kumar; Namita Samanta; S V S Rana
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.396

5.  Radioprotective properties of Hippophae rhamnoides (sea buckthorn) extract in vitro.

Authors:  Angara V S Sureshbabu; Tapan Kumar Barik; I Namita; I Prem Kumar
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2008-07

6.  Modification of radiation damage to mitochondrial system in vivo by Podophyllum hexandrum: mechanistic aspects.

Authors:  Damodar Gupta; Rajesh Arora; Amar Prakash Garg; Madhu Bala; Harish Chandra Goel
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 7.  The Anticancer Activity of Sea Buckthorn [Elaeagnus rhamnoides (L.) A. Nelson].

Authors:  Beata Olas; Bartosz Skalski; Karolina Ulanowska
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 8.  Abundance of active ingredients in sea-buckthorn oil.

Authors:  Aleksandra Zielińska; Izabela Nowak
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 9.  The bioactive components as well as the nutritional and health effects of sea buckthorn.

Authors:  Ruru Ren; Nan Li; Chao Su; Yingli Wang; Xiaojun Zhao; Lingling Yang; Yanting Li; Bo Zhang; Jianyu Chen; Xueqin Ma
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 4.036

10.  Protective effects of seabuckthorn pulp and seed oils against radiation-induced acute intestinal injury.

Authors:  Jing Shi; Lan Wang; Yan Lu; Yue Ji; Yaqing Wang; Ke Dong; Xiangqing Kong; Wei Sun
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 2.724

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.