Literature DB >> 15387028

Enhanced speed and precision of measurement in a computer-assisted digital cephalometric analysis system.

Ssu-Kuang Chen1, Yi-Jane Chen, Chung-Chen Jane Yao, Hsin-Fu Chang.   

Abstract

The computer-assisted digital cephalometric analysis system (CADCAS) may reduce the time required for cephalometric analysis, especially for taking measurements. Aimed at estimating the time saved by using CADCAS, we measured the time needed by a clinician to perform the analysis in a traditional manner. We also sought to verify the accuracy achieved by traditional cephalometric analysis by exploring the disagreement between manual measurements and those generated by CADCAS. Our results revealed that, on average, even an experienced clinician needed more than 25 minutes to perform an entire cephalometric analysis using a traditional method, with more than 15 minutes of this needed just for taking measurements. Disagreements between measurements by traditional method and those by CADCAS were most frequently noted in the measurement value of cephalometric items reflecting the severity of a jaw discrepancy by the "sign" reflecting the anteroposterior relationship. After excluding the measurements with obvious error, the measurement differences between traditional method and CADCAS were not statistically significant in 23 of a total of 26 cephalometric items. In conclusion, the CADCAS can reduce the time needed for cephalometric analysis and can help reduce the human errors introduced during the manual-measuring procedure in the traditional cephalometric analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15387028     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0501:ESAPOM>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  7 in total

1.  Diagnosis of dental deformities in cephalometry images using support vector machine.

Authors:  Arumugam Banumathi; S Raju; Varathan Abhaikumar
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Comparative evaluation of cephalometric measurements of monitor-displayed images by Nemoceph software and its hard copy by manual tracing.

Authors:  Tripti Tikku; Rohit Khanna; R P Maurya; Kamna Srivastava; Rastra Bhushan
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2014-01-08

3.  Assessing the Reliability of Digitalized Cephalometric Analysis in Comparison with Manual Cephalometric Analysis.

Authors:  Mohammed Umar Farooq; Mohd Asadullah Khan; Shahid Imran; Ayesha Sameera; Arshad Qureshi; Syed Afroz Ahmed; Sujan Kumar; Mohd Aziz Ur Rahman
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-10-01

4.  Ceph-X: development and evaluation of 2D cephalometric system.

Authors:  Mogeeb Ahmed Ahmed Mosleh; Mohd Sapiyan Baba; Sorayya Malek; Rasheed A Almaktari
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Biplanar Low-Dose Radiograph Is Suitable for Cephalometric Analysis in Patients Requiring 3D Evaluation of the Whole Skeleton.

Authors:  Adeline Kerbrat; Isabelle Rivals; Pauline Dupuy; Gauthier Dot; Britt-Isabelle Berg; Valérie Attali; Thomas Schouman
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Relationship between cranial and mandibular growth and the stages of maturation of the cervical vertebrae.

Authors:  Melissa Feres Damian; Fernando Cechinato; Rafael Dagnese Molina; Fábio Eduardo Woitchunas
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  A hard tissue cephalometric comparative study between hand tracing and computerized tracing.

Authors:  Ramachandra Prabhakar; P Rajakumar; M K Karthikeyan; R Saravanan; N Raj Vikram; Adarsh Reddy
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2014-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.