Literature DB >> 15386639

Screening for distress in cancer patients: the NCCN rapid-screening measure.

Benson M Hoffman1, Michael A Zevon, Mary C D'Arrigo, Tracy B Cecchini.   

Abstract

The present investigation evaluated the NCCN distress management screening measure (DMSM) in a sample of 68 mixed site cancer patients. The DMSM was administered with the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) and the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18). Convergent validity was established by the moderate positive correlation between the DMSM and the BSI and BSI-18 global severity indices (r=0.59, p<0.001 and r=0.61, p<0.001, respectively). Divergent validity was demonstrated by the lower correlations between the DMSM and the BSI subscales suggestive of psychopathology (e.g. paranoid ideation, obsessive-compulsive). Receiver operative characteristic (ROC) analyses demonstrated that the DMSM has moderate ability to detect distress identified by the BSI and the BSI-18 (area under curve=0.74, p<0.001 and 0.80, respectively, p<0.01, respectively). While the ROC curves suggested that the DMSM lacks a single cutoff that maximizes sensitivity and specificity, the use of multiple cutoffs renders the DMSM an effective and very rapid screen for distress among cancer patients. Copyright (c) 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15386639     DOI: 10.1002/pon.796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  47 in total

1.  Senior adult oncology.

Authors:  Arti Hurria; Ilene S Browner; Harvey Jay Cohen; Crystal S Denlinger; Mollie deShazo; Martine Extermann; Apar Kishor P Ganti; Jimmie C Holland; Holly M Holmes; Mohana B Karlekar; Nancy L Keating; June McKoy; Bruno C Medeiros; Ewa Mrozek; Tracey O'Connor; Stephen H Petersdorf; Hope S Rugo; Rebecca A Silliman; William P Tew; Louise C Walter; Alva B Weir; Tanya Wildes
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 11.908

2.  Using Rasch analysis to examine the distress thermometer's cut-off scores among a mixed group of patients with cancer.

Authors:  Sylvie D Lambert; Julie F Pallant; Kerrie Clover; Benjamin Britton; Madeleine T King; Gregory Carter
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Validity of the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18) for identifying depression and anxiety in young adult cancer survivors: Comparison with a Structured Clinical Diagnostic Interview.

Authors:  Christopher J Recklitis; Jaime E Blackmon; Grace Chang
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2017-01-12

4.  The effects of response bias on self-reported quality of life among childhood cancer survivors.

Authors:  Tara E O'Leary; Lisa Diller; Christopher J Recklitis
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Symptom Management and Psychosocial Needs of Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia During Induction Treatment: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Tara A Albrecht; Michael Boyiadzis; R K Elswick; Angela Starkweather; Margaret Rosenzweig
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 2.592

6.  Removing the stress from selecting instruments: arming social workers to take leadership in routine distress screening implementation.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Rohan
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2012

7.  The James Supportive Care Screening: integrating science and practice to meet the NCCN guidelines for distress management at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Authors:  Sharla Wells-Di Gregorio; Emily K Porensky; Matthew Minotti; Susan Brown; Janet Snapp; Robert M Taylor; Michael D Adolph; Sherman Everett; Kenneth Lowther; Kelly Callahan; Devita Streva; Vicki Heinke; Debra Leno; Courtney Flower; Anne McVey; Barbara Lee Andersen
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Sexual concerns in cancer patients: a comparison of GI and breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Jennifer Barsky Reese; Rebecca A Shelby; Francis J Keefe; Laura S Porter; Amy P Abernethy
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Distress screening remains important during follow-up after primary breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Floortje K Ploos van Amstel; Sanne W van den Berg; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Marieke F M Gielissen; Judith B Prins; Petronella B Ottevanger
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Feasibility of brief psychological distress screening by a community-based telephone helpline for cancer patients and carers.

Authors:  Anna L Hawkes; Karen L Hughes; Sandy D Hutchison; Suzanne K Chambers
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.