Literature DB >> 35515489

Effects of simulation for gynaecological ultrasound scan training: a systematic review.

Natalie Jane Woodhead1, Ayesha Mahmud1, Justin Clark1.   

Abstract

Introduction: Simulation is a potentially promising solution to some of the challenges in delivering ultrasound training, and in the last decade, research in simulation-based education has rapidly expanded. There have been no prior focused systematic reviews on the effects of simulation on gynaecological ultrasound scan training. The aim of this review was to summarise and critically appraise the available evidence.
Methods: Medline, EMBASE, CINHAL, BNI, PubMed, ERIC, Cochrane Library and ISRCTN Register of Clinical Trials were searched using selected terminology. No language restrictions were applied. The selection criteria were studies of all types that investigated the use of a simulator to teach gynaecological ultrasound. Data evaluating study outcomes, along with methodological details, were extracted in duplicate. The outcomes were classified according to the Kirkpatrick hierarchy and included: patient-related outcomes, such as discomfort; organisational efficiency outcomes, such as examination times; and trainee-related outcomes, such as competence, skill and confidence.
Results: Fourteen studies with 573 participants were included: seven randomised controlled trials, three controlled observational studies and four uncontrolled observational studies. The use of simulation practice in gynaecological ultrasound in addition to standard approaches for teaching is associated with significant improvements in competence, skill and confidence of trainees and reduced patient discomfort, increased perceived patient safety and enhanced confidence in the trainee.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that simulation in the early stages of training in gynaecological ultrasound is beneficial for the trainee, patients and has organisational benefits through reduced examinations times and need for supervision. Future research needs to confirm these findings in the different settings. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gynaecology; simulation training; systematic review; transvaginal ultrasound; ultrasound

Year:  2020        PMID: 35515489      PMCID: PMC8936592          DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn        ISSN: 2056-6697


  26 in total

1.  Fundamental principles of validation, and reliability: rigorous science for the assessment of surgical education and training.

Authors:  A G Gallagher; E M Ritter; R M Satava
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Ultrasound simulators: experience with the SonoTrainer and comparative review of other training systems.

Authors:  H Maul; A Scharf; P Baier; M Wüstemann; H H Günter; G Gebauer; C Sohn
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  Reliable and valid assessment of ultrasound operator competence in obstetrics and gynecology.

Authors:  M G Tolsgaard; C Ringsted; E Dreisler; A Klemmensen; A Loft; J L Sorensen; B Ottesen; A Tabor
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 7.299

4.  The Predictive Value of Ultrasound Learning Curves Across Simulated and Clinical Settings.

Authors:  Mette E Madsen; Lone N Nørgaard; Ann Tabor; Lars Konge; Charlotte Ringsted; Martin G Tolsgaard
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 5.  Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  David A Cook; Rose Hatala; Ryan Brydges; Benjamin Zendejas; Jason H Szostek; Amy T Wang; Patricia J Erwin; Stanley J Hamstra
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The Effects of Simulation-based Transvaginal Ultrasound Training on Quality and Efficiency of Care: A Multicenter Single-blind Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Martin G Tolsgaard; Charlotte Ringsted; Susanne Rosthøj; Lone Nørgaard; Lars Møller; Nina La Cour Freiesleben; Liv Dyre; Ann Tabor
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Role of pelvic ultrasound simulation.

Authors:  Sushila Arya; Zuber D Mulla; Sanja Kupesic Plavsic
Journal:  Clin Teach       Date:  2017-10-10

8.  Training in transvaginal sonography using pelvic ultrasound simulators versus live models: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  James H Moak; Shannon R Larese; John P Riordan; Amita Sudhir; Guofen Yan
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 9.  Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review.

Authors:  S Barry Issenberg; William C McGaghie; Emil R Petrusa; David Lee Gordon; Ross J Scalese
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.650

10.  The effectiveness of the use of high fidelity simulators in obstetric ultrasound training: A systematic review.

Authors:  Brooke Osborne; Nayana Parange; Kerry Thoirs
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.