Literature DB >> 15385595

Dominance of the right hemisphere and role of area 2 in human kinesthesia.

Eiichi Naito1, Per E Roland, Christian Grefkes, H J Choi, Simon Eickhoff, Stefan Geyer, Karl Zilles, H Henrik Ehrsson.   

Abstract

We have previously shown that motor areas are engaged when subjects experience illusory limb movements elicited by tendon vibration. However, traditionally cytoarchitectonic area 2 is held responsible for kinesthesia. Here we use functional magnetic resonance imaging and cytoarchitectural mapping to examine whether area 2 is engaged in kinesthesia, whether it is engaged bilaterally because area 2 in non-human primates has strong callosal connections, which other areas are active members of the network for kinesthesia, and if there is a dominance for the right hemisphere in kinesthesia as has been suggested. Ten right-handed blindfolded healthy subjects participated. The tendon of the extensor carpi ulnaris muscles of the right or left hand was vibrated at 80 Hz, which elicited illusory palmar flexion in an immobile hand (illusion). As control we applied identical stimuli to the skin over the processus styloideus ulnae, which did not elicit any illusions (vibration). We found robust activations in cortical motor areas [areas 4a, 4p, 6; dorsal premotor cortex (PMD) and bilateral supplementary motor area (SMA)] and ipsilateral cerebellum during kinesthetic illusions (illusion-vibration). The illusions also activated contralateral area 2 and right area 2 was active in common irrespective of illusions of right or left hand. Right areas 44, 45, anterior part of intraparietal region (IP1) and caudo-lateral part of parietal opercular region (OP1), cortex rostral to PMD, anterior insula and superior temporal gyrus were also activated in common during illusions of right or left hand. These right-sided areas were significantly more activated than the corresponding areas in the left hemisphere. The present data, together with our previous results, suggest that human kinesthesia is associated with a network of active brain areas that consists of motor areas, cerebellum, and the right fronto-parietal areas including high-order somatosensory areas. Furthermore, our results provide evidence for a right hemisphere dominance for perception of limb movement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15385595     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00637.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  72 in total

Review 1.  Consensus paper: roles of the cerebellum in motor control--the diversity of ideas on cerebellar involvement in movement.

Authors:  Mario Manto; James M Bower; Adriana Bastos Conforto; José M Delgado-García; Suzete Nascimento Farias da Guarda; Marcus Gerwig; Christophe Habas; Nobuhiro Hagura; Richard B Ivry; Peter Mariën; Marco Molinari; Eiichi Naito; Dennis A Nowak; Nordeyn Oulad Ben Taib; Denis Pelisson; Claudia D Tesche; Caroline Tilikete; Dagmar Timmann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 2.  Plastic changes in hand proprioception following force-field motor learning.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; Joaquin A Anguera
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  fMRI investigation of unexpected somatosensory feedback perturbation during speech.

Authors:  Elisa Golfinopoulos; Jason A Tourville; Jason W Bohland; Satrajit S Ghosh; Alfonso Nieto-Castanon; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Tactile form and location processing in the human brain.

Authors:  Robert W Van Boven; John E Ingeholm; Michael S Beauchamp; Philip C Bikle; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Long lasting aftereffect of a single prism adaptation: Directionally biased shift in proprioception and late onset shift of internal egocentric reference frame.

Authors:  Yohko Hatada; R Chris Miall; Yves Rossetti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Lighter or heavier than predicted: neural correlates of corrective mechanisms during erroneously programmed lifts.

Authors:  Per Jenmalm; Christina Schmitz; Hans Forssberg; H Henrik Ehrsson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Task-dependent asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback for goal-directed movement.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; Susan H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Parietal proprioceptive loss with pseudoathetosis.

Authors:  F Salih; C Zimmer; H Meierkord
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  A systems perspective on the effective connectivity of overt speech production.

Authors:  Simon B Eickhoff; Stefan Heim; Karl Zilles; Katrin Amunts
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Asymmetry and dyslexia.

Authors:  Christiana M Leonard; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.253

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.