Literature DB >> 15385110

Introduction of transperitoneal lymphadenectomy in a gynecologic oncology center: analysis of 650 laparoscopic pelvic and/or paraaortic transperitoneal lymphadenectomies.

Christhardt Köhler1, Petra Klemm, Anja Schau, Marc Possover, Norman Krause, Roberto Tozzi, Achim Schneider.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Lymphadenectomy is an integral part of staging and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. We evaluated the feasibility and oncologic value of laparoscopic transperitoneal pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in correlation to complication rate and body mass index.
METHODS: Between August 1994 and September 2003, pelvic and/or paraaortic transperitoneal laparoscopic lymphadenectomy was performed in 650 patients at the Department of Gynecology of the Friedrich-Schiller University of Jena. Retrospective and prospective data collection and evaluation of videotapes were possible in 606 patients. Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy was part of the following surgical procedures: staging laparoscopy in patients with advanced cervical cancer (n = 133) or early ovarian cancer (n = 44), trachelectomy in patients with early cervical cancer (n = 42), laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer (n = 221), laparoscopy before exenteration in patients with pelvic recurrence (n = 20), laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy or laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy in patients with endometrial cancer (n = 112), and operative procedures for other indications (n = 34).
RESULTS: After a learning period of approximately 20 procedures, a constant number of pelvic lymph nodes (16.9-21.9) was removed over the years. Pelvic lymphadenectomy took 28 min, and parametric lymphadenectomy took 18 min for each side. The number of removed paraaortic lymph nodes increased continuously over the years from 5.5 to 18.5. Right-sided paraaortic, left-sided inframesenteric and left-sided infrarenal lymphadenectomy took an average of 36, 28, and 62 min, respectively. The number of removed lymph nodes was independent from the body mass index of the patient. Duration of pelvic lymphadenectomy was independent of body mass index, but right-sided paraaortic lymphadenectomy lasted significantly longer in obese women (35 vs. 41 min, P = 0,011). The overall complication rate was 8.7% with 2.9% intraoperative (vessel or bowel injury) and 5.8% postoperative complications. No major intraoperative complication was encountered during the last 5 years of the study.
CONCLUSION: By transperitoneal laparoscopic lymphadenectomy, an adequate number of lymph nodes can be removed in an adequate time and independent from body mass index. The complication rate is low and can be minimized by standardization of the procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15385110     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.07.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  21 in total

1.  Laparoscopic extraperitoneal aortic dissection: does single-port surgery offer the same possibilities as conventional laparoscopy?

Authors:  Eric Lambaudie; Francesco Cannone; Marie Bannier; Max Buttarelli; Gilles Houvenaeghel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy around the left renal vein (16a2lat) by tunneling under the pancreas for advanced Siewert type II adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Shuji Takiguchi; Yasuhiro Miyazaki; Kohei Murakami; Tomoki Makino; Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Yukinori Kurokawa; Makoto Yamasaki; Kiyokazu Nakajima; Hiroshi Miyata; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  The current status of laparoscopic and robotic para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancer surgery.

Authors:  Thomas Ind
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 4.401

4.  Adjuvant chemoradiation after laparoscopically assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy (LARVH) in patients with cervical cancer: oncologic outcome and morbidity.

Authors:  Arne Gruen; Thabea Musik; Christhardt Köhler; Jürgen Füller; Thomas Wendt; Carmen Stromberger; Volker Budach; Achim Schneider; Simone Marnitz
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 5.  Minimally invasive surgical approaches for patients with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Michael Frumovitz; Pedro Escobar; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.190

Review 6.  Innovative laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic oncology.

Authors:  Siobhan M Kehoe; Pedro T Ramirez; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  Comparative evaluation of surgical stress of laparoscopically assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy and laparotomy for early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Cai-Ying Hou; Xiu-Li Li; Feng Jiang; Rong Jie Gong; Xin Yu Guo; Yuan-Qing Yao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  Complications of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer: experience based on 317 procedures.

Authors:  H Xu; Y Chen; Y Li; Q Zhang; D Wang; Z Liang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Extra-peritoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy--a prospective cohort study of 293 patients with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Sean C Dowdy; Giovanni Aletti; William A Cliby; Karl C Podratz; Andrea Mariani
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Major vascular injury during gynecologic cancer surgery.

Authors:  Andrea L Buras; Jing Yi Chern; Hye Sook Chon; Mian M Shahzad; Robert M Wenham; Mitchel S Hoffman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.