Literature DB >> 22848260

Comparative evaluation of surgical stress of laparoscopically assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy and laparotomy for early-stage cervical cancer.

Cai-Ying Hou1, Xiu-Li Li, Feng Jiang, Rong Jie Gong, Xin Yu Guo, Yuan-Qing Yao.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to objectively evaluate the benefits of laparoscopically assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. Clinical data were prospectively collected from patients with IA-IIB cervical cancer who underwent laparoscopically assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy (n1=33) and laparotomy (n2=30). Peripheral blood samples were obtained prior to surgery and at 1 and 2 h into the operation, as well as on days 1, 4 and 7 following surgery to measure serum interleukin-6, C-reaction protein and cortisol. Results showed that there was no conversion to laparotomy in the laparoscopy group. The average blood loss was 317.23±217.20 ml (laparoscopy group) and 872.58±693.16 ml (laparotomy group). No significant difference was found in the number of resected pelvic lymph nodes (19.74±7.43 in the laparoscopy group and 20.35±6.62 in the laparotomy group). At days 1 and 7 after surgery, the serum IL-6 level was significantly different in the laparoscopy and laparotomy groups (day 1: laparoscopy group 17.14±16.53 pg/ml and laparotomy group 34.32±20.97 pg/ml, p=0.001; day 7: laparoscopy group 6.7±7.21 pg/ml and laparotomy group 17.54±16.47 pg/ml, p=0.001). The serum CRP level was significantly different at days 1 and 7 after the operation (day 1: laparoscopy group 7024.72±949.12 ng/ml and laparotomy group 7586.61±869.42 ng/ml, p=0.018; day 7: laparoscopy group 4357.71±2108.85 ng/ml and laparotomy group 6967.96±995.02 ng/ml, p<0.001). A significant difference was noted in the serum cortisol level at day 4 after the operation (122.29±65.17 ng/ml in the laparoscopy group and 186.76±68.61 ng/ml in the laparotomy group, p<0.001). In conclusion, the differences in clinical data and the various parameters pertinent to surgical stress evaluated in this study suggest that laparoscopic surgery for cervical cancer causes less postoperative stress than conventional open surgery.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22848260      PMCID: PMC3406333          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2011.311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  35 in total

1.  Laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in the staging of early carcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  D Querleu; E Leblanc; B Castelain
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Effects of anaesthesia and surgery on the immune response.

Authors:  M Salo
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.105

3.  Increased tumor growth and spread after laparoscopy vs laparotomy: influence of tumor manipulation in a rat model.

Authors:  D Mutter; A Hajri; V Tassetti; C Solis-Caxaj; M Aprahamian; J Marescaux
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Combined laparoscopic and vaginal radical surgery in cervical cancer.

Authors:  M C Renaud; M Plante; M Roy
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  The combination of growth hormone with hepatocyte growth factor alters the acute phase response.

Authors:  M G Jeschke; S E Wolf; M A DebRoy; D N Herndon
Journal:  Shock       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy by the Pune technique: our experience of 248 cases.

Authors:  Shailesh P Puntambekar; Reshma J Palep; Seema S Puntambekar; Girija N Wagh; Anjali M Patil; Neeraj V Rayate; Geetanjali A Agarwal
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.137

7.  Schauta's vaginal hysterectomy combined with laparoscopic lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  D Dargent; P Mathevet
Journal:  Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1995-12

8.  A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.

Authors:  H Steed; B Rosen; J Murphy; S Laframboise; D De Petrillo; A Covens
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Immunologic postoperative competence after laparoscopy versus laparotomy.

Authors:  G Bolla; G Tuzzato
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III) with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage I cervical cancer: surgical morbidity and intermediate follow-up.

Authors:  Nick M Spirtos; Scott M Eisenkop; John B Schlaerth; Samuel C Ballon
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  6 in total

1.  Clinical observation of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Xiang-Hua Yin; Zhong-Qin Wang; Shi-Zhang Yang; Hong-Yan Jia; Min Shi
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-05-15

2.  Impact of hospital care volume on clinical outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Banghyun Lee; Kidong Kim; Youngmi Park; Myong Cheol Lim; Robert E Bristow
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Morbidity after surgical management of cervical cancer in low and middle income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emma R Allanson; Aime Powell; Max Bulsara; Hong Lim Lee; Lynette Denny; Yee Leung; Paul Cohen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Evaluation of the efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for treating cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhen Zeng; Jia Liu; Tao Lv; Zonghao Feng; Lei Zhang; Qinping Liao
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 1.195

5.  Total Laparoscopic Versus Laparotomic Radical Hysterectomy and Lymphadenectomy in Cervical Cancer: An Observational Study of 13-Year Experience.

Authors:  Meizhu Xiao; Zhenyu Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Sichen Zhang; Linlin Ma; Qing Wei Meng; Dan Zhou; Tuerhongayi Moyiding
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.889

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.