Literature DB >> 15383872

Assessing ecological resources for remediation and future land uses on contaminated lands.

Joanna Burger1, Mary Anne Carletta, Karen Lowrie, K Tyler Miller, Michael Greenberg.   

Abstract

Increasingly, the public and governmental agencies are concerned about remediating and reclaiming contaminated sites. Understanding the ecological resources on-site and valuing those resources in terms of future uses is important for determining suitable future land uses. In this article, we suggest the major categories of natural resource information required by managers, policy makers, and the general public for making initial future land-use determinations. We then use a dataset of 25 Department of Energy (DOE) sites slated for remediation to explore whether such data are readily available and whether the data can be used to assess natural resource value. Although information is available for almost all sites on federally endangered and threatened species, this information is less available for state-listed species. Biodiversity information is available only for some sites for birds ( N = 17), mammals ( N = 15), reptiles ( N = 14), amphibians ( N = 13), and plants ( N = 11) and is almost nonexistent for invertebrates ( N = 2). Some information is available for invasive species ( N = 9). The number of available habitats is directly related to total acres and nonindustrial acres. Biodiversity of birds, mammals, and reptiles (but not amphibians) is directly related to both total acres and total nonindustrial acres of sites. These data suggest that even over a wide geographical area (from eastern to western United States), biodiversity relates to habitat size and number of habitats available. This information will be useful not only to DOE managers but also to natural resource trustees, ecologists, state and federal regulators, and the general public in the discourse over future uses of these lands.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15383872     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-004-0212-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  6 in total

1.  Can David and Goliath get along? Federal land in local places.

Authors:  K W Lowrie; M R Greenberg
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Integrating environmental restoration and ecological restoration: long-term stewardship at the department of energy.

Authors:  J Burger
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 3.  New concepts in ecological risk assessment: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Keith R Solomon; Paul Sibley
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.553

4.  Protection of the environment: how to position radioprotection in an ecological risk assessment perspective.

Authors:  François Bréchignac
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2003-05-20       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Contaminated Department of Energy facilities and ecosystems: weighing the ecological risks.

Authors:  J Burger
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2000-09-29

6.  Shifting priorities at the Department of Energy's bomb factories: protecting human and ecological health.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Thomas M Leschine; Michael Greenberg; James R Karr; Michael Gochfeld; Charles W Powers
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.266

  6 in total
  14 in total

1.  Vegetation cover and long-term conservation of radioactive waste packages: the case study of the CSM waste disposal facility (Manche District, France).

Authors:  Yves Petit-Berghem; Guy Lemperiere
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Complexity of bioindicator selection for ecological, human, and cultural health: Chinook salmon and red knot as case studies.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld; Lawrence Niles; Charles Powers; Kevin Brown; James Clarke; Amanda Dey; David Kosson
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Natural resource protection on buffer lands: integrating resource evaluation and economics.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld; Michael Greenberg
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Long-term biological monitoring of an impaired stream: synthesis and environmental management implications.

Authors:  Mark J Peterson; Rebecca A Efroymson; S Marshall Adams
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Introduction to the biological monitoring and abatement program.

Authors:  Mark J Peterson
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  A Methodology to Evaluate Ecological Resources and Risk Using Two Case Studies at the Department of Energy's Hanford Site.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld; Amoret Bunn; Janelle Downs; Christian Jeitner; Taryn Pittfield; Jennifer Salisbury; David Kosson
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  Risk valuation of ecological resources at contaminated deactivation and decommissioning facilities: methodology and a case study at the Department of Energy's Hanford site.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld; Christian Jeitner
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Information needs for siting new, and evaluating current, nuclear facilities: ecology, fate and transport, and human health.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; James Clarke; Michael Gochfeld
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 2.513

9.  Health Risks to Ecological Workers on Contaminated Sites - the Department of Energy as a Case Study.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld
Journal:  J Community Med Health Educ       Date:  2016-05-27

10.  Frequency and rates of outdoor activities, and perceptions of places to perform these activities by Native Americans and Caucasians interviewed in Tennessee.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld; Christian Jeitner; Taryn Pittfield; Meredith Marchioni
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.184

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.