Literature DB >> 27904947

A Methodology to Evaluate Ecological Resources and Risk Using Two Case Studies at the Department of Energy's Hanford Site.

Joanna Burger1,2, Michael Gochfeld3,4, Amoret Bunn5, Janelle Downs5, Christian Jeitner6,3, Taryn Pittfield6,3, Jennifer Salisbury3, David Kosson3.   

Abstract

An assessment of the potential risks to ecological resources from remediation activities or other perturbations should involve a quantitative evaluation of resources on the remediation site and in the surrounding environment. We developed a risk methodology to rapidly evaluate potential impact on ecological resources for the U.S. Department of Energy's Hanford Site in southcentral Washington State. We describe the application of the risk evaluation for two case studies to illustrate its applicability. The ecological assessment involves examining previous sources of information for the site, defining different resource levels from 0 to 5. We also developed a risk rating scale from non-discernable to very high. Field assessment is the critical step to determine resource levels or to determine if current conditions are the same as previously evaluated. We provide a rapid assessment method for current ecological conditions that can be compared to previous site-specific data, or that can be used to assess resource value on other sites where ecological information is not generally available. The method is applicable to other Department of Energy's sites, where its development may involve a range of state regulators, resource trustees, Tribes and other stakeholders. Achieving consistency across Department of Energy's sites for valuation of ecological resources on remediation sites will assure Congress and the public that funds and personnel are being deployed appropriately.

Keywords:  Assessment method; Ecological resources; Remediation; Risk evaluation; Risk methodology; Risk rating

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27904947     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-016-0798-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  23 in total

1.  Integrating environmental restoration and ecological restoration: long-term stewardship at the department of energy.

Authors:  J Burger
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Assessing ecological resources for remediation and future land uses on contaminated lands.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Mary Anne Carletta; Karen Lowrie; K Tyler Miller; Michael Greenberg
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004-06-29       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Lost ecosystem services as a measure of oil spill damages: a conceptual analysis of the importance of baselines.

Authors:  Chris J Kennedy; So-Min Cheong
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 6.789

Review 4.  Disproportionate exposures in environmental justice and other populations: the importance of outliers.

Authors:  Michael Gochfeld; Joanna Burger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Remediating radium contaminated legacy sites: Advances made through machine learning in routine monitoring of "hot" particles.

Authors:  Adam Varley; Andrew Tyler; Leslie Smith; Paul Dale; Mike Davies
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Information needs for siting new, and evaluating current, nuclear facilities: ecology, fate and transport, and human health.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; James Clarke; Michael Gochfeld
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Environmental management: integrating ecological evaluation, remediation, restoration, natural resource damage assessment and long-term stewardship on contaminated lands.

Authors:  Joanna Burger
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Is there an environmental benefit from remediation of a contaminated site? Combined assessments of the risk reduction and life cycle impact of remediation.

Authors:  Gitte Lemming; Julie C Chambon; Philip J Binning; Poul L Bjerg
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 6.789

9.  Depth of the biologically active zone in upland habitats at the Hanford Site, Washington: Implications for remediation and ecological risk management.

Authors:  Bradley E Sample; John Lowe; Paul Seeley; Melanie Markin; Chris McCarthy; Jim Hansen; Alaa H Aly
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 2.992

10.  Ecocultural attributes: evaluating ecological degradation in terms of ecological goods and services versus subsistence and tribal values.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld; Karen Pletnikoff; Ronald Snigaroff; Daniel Snigaroff; Tim Stamm
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 4.000

View more
  2 in total

1.  Risk valuation of ecological resources at contaminated deactivation and decommissioning facilities: methodology and a case study at the Department of Energy's Hanford site.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld; Christian Jeitner
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  A paradigm for protecting ecological resources following remediation as a function of future land use designations: a case study for the Department of Energy's Hanford Site.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld; David S Kosson; Kevin G Brown; Jennifer Salisbury; Christian Jeitner
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 2.513

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.