Literature DB >> 17899418

Natural resource protection on buffer lands: integrating resource evaluation and economics.

Joanna Burger1, Michael Gochfeld, Michael Greenberg.   

Abstract

Environmental managers are faced with the wise management, sustainability, and stewardship of their land for natural resource values. This task requires the integration of ecological evaluation with economics. Using the Department of Energy (DOE) as a case study, we examine the why, who, what, where, when, and how questions about assessment and natural resource protection of buffer lands. We suggest that managers evaluate natural resources for a variety of reasons that revolve around land use, remediation/restoration, protection of natural environments, and natural resource damage assessment (NRDA). While DOE is the manager of its lands, and thus its natural resources, a range of natural resource trustees and public officials have co-responsibility. We distinguish four types of natural resource evaluations: (1) the resources themselves (to the ecosystem), (2) the value of specific resources to people (e.g. hunting/fishing/bird-watching/herbal medicines), (3) the value of ecological resources to services for communities (e.g. clean air/water), and (4) the value of the intact ecosystems (e.g. forests or estuaries). Resource evaluations should occur initially to provide information about the status of those resources, and continued evaluation is required to provide trends data. Additional natural resource evaluation is required before, during and immediately following changes in land use, and remediation or restoration. Afterwards, additional monitoring and evaluations are required to evaluate the effects of the land use change or the efficacy of remediation/restoration. There are a wide range of economic methods available to evaluate natural resources, but the methods chosen depend upon the nature of the resource being evaluated, the purpose of the evaluation, and the needs of the agencies, natural resource trustees, public officials, and the public. We discuss the uses, and the advantages and disadvantages of different evaluation methods for natural resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17899418      PMCID: PMC4300138          DOI: 10.1007/s10661-007-9903-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  5 in total

Review 1.  Selecting indicator species to monitor ecological integrity: a review.

Authors:  Vincent Carignan; Marc-André Villard
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Assessing ecological resources for remediation and future land uses on contaminated lands.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Mary Anne Carletta; Karen Lowrie; K Tyler Miller; Michael Greenberg
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004-06-29       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Environment. Avoiding destructive remediation at DOE sites.

Authors:  F W Whicker; T G Hinton; M M MacDonell; J E Pinder; L J Habegger
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-03-12       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The Environmental Protection Agency's brownfields pilot program.

Authors:  Michael R Greenberg; Justin Hollander
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Shifting priorities at the Department of Energy's bomb factories: protecting human and ecological health.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Thomas M Leschine; Michael Greenberg; James R Karr; Michael Gochfeld; Charles W Powers
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.266

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Regulatory requirements and tools for environmental assessment of hazardous wastes: understanding tribal and stakeholder concerns using Department of Energy sites.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Charles Powers; Michael Gochfeld
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 6.789

2.  Environmental management: integrating ecological evaluation, remediation, restoration, natural resource damage assessment and long-term stewardship on contaminated lands.

Authors:  Joanna Burger
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Collaboration versus communication: The Department of Energy's Amchitka Island and the Aleut Community.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld; Karen Pletnikoff
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 6.498

4.  Ecocultural attributes: evaluating ecological degradation in terms of ecological goods and services versus subsistence and tribal values.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld; Karen Pletnikoff; Ronald Snigaroff; Daniel Snigaroff; Tim Stamm
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 4.000

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.