Literature DB >> 15382056

Binding and interstitial penetration of liposomes within avascular tumor spheroids.

Kostas Kostarelos1, Dimitris Emfietzoglou, Alexandros Papakostas, Wei-Hong Yang, Ase Ballangrud, George Sgouros.   

Abstract

The liposomal delivery of cancer therapeutics, including gene therapy vectors, is an area of intense study. Poor penetration of liposomes into interstitial tumor spaces remains a problem, however. In this work, the penetration of different liposomal formulations into prostate carcinoma spheroids was examined. Spheroid penetration was assessed by confocal microscopy of fluorescently labeled liposomes. The impact of liposomal surface charge, mean diameter, lipid bilayer fluidity and fusogenicity on spheroid penetration was examined. A variety of different liposome systems relevant to clinical or preclinical protocols have been studied, including classical zwitterionic (DMPC:chol) and sterically stabilized liposomes (DMPC:chol:DOPE-PEG2000), both used clinically, and cationic liposomes (DMPC:DOPE:DC-chol and DOTAP), forming the basis of the vast majority of nonviral gene transfer vectors tested in various cancer trials. Surface interactions between strongly cationic vesicles and the tumor cells led to an electrostatically derived binding-site barrier effect, inhibiting further association of the delivery systems with the tumor spheroids (DMPC:DC-chol). However, inclusion of the fusogenic lipid DOPE and use of a cationic lipid of lower surface charge density (DOTAP instead of DC-chol) led to improvements in the observed intratumoral distribution characteristics. Sterically stabilized liposomes did not interact with the tumor spheroids, whereas small unilamellar classical liposomes exhibit extensive distribution deeper into the tumor volume. Engineering liposomal delivery systems with a relatively low charge molar ratio and enhanced fusogenicity, or electrostatically neutral liposomes with fluid bilayers, offered enhanced intratumoral penetration. This study shows that a delicate balance exists between the strong affinity of delivery systems for the tumor cells and the efficient penetration and distribution within the tumor mass, similar to previous work studying targeted delivery by ligand-receptor interactions of monoclonal antibodies. Structure-function relationships from the interaction of different liposome systems with 3-dimensional tumor spheroids can lead to construction of delivery systems able to target efficiently and penetrate deeper within the tumor interstitium and act as a screening tool for a variety of therapeutics against cancer. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15382056     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.20457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  41 in total

1.  Nanotechnology for energy-based cancer therapies.

Authors:  Kyle Gilstrap; Xiaoxiao Hu; Xiongbin Lu; Xiaoming He
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 6.166

2.  Combined local blood-brain barrier opening and systemic methotrexate for the treatment of brain tumors.

Authors:  Itzik Cooper; David Last; David Guez; Shirley Sharabi; Shirin Elhaik Goldman; Irit Lubitz; Dianne Daniels; Sharona Salomon; Gregory Tamar; Tzur Tamir; Ronni Mardor; Mati Fridkin; Yoram Shechter; Yael Mardor
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 6.200

3.  Binding and transport of PAMAM-RGD in a tumor spheroid model: the effect of RGD targeting ligand density.

Authors:  Carolyn L Waite; Charles M Roth
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  A perfusable 3D cell-matrix tissue culture chamber for in situ evaluation of nanoparticle vehicle penetration and transport.

Authors:  Chee Ping Ng; Suzie Hwang Pun
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  YOYO as a dye to track penetration of LK15 DNA complexes in spheroids: use and limits.

Authors:  Heather A D Perry; Amer F Alhaj Saleh; Harmesh Aojula; Alain Pluen
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 6.  In vitro microfluidic models of tumor microenvironment to screen transport of drugs and nanoparticles.

Authors:  Altug Ozcelikkale; Hye-Ran Moon; Michael Linnes; Bumsoo Han
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2017-02-14

7.  Selective filtering of particles by the extracellular matrix: an electrostatic bandpass.

Authors:  Oliver Lieleg; Regina M Baumgärtel; Andreas R Bausch
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 8.  Nanoscale drug delivery systems for enhanced drug penetration into solid tumors: current progress and opportunities.

Authors:  Carolyn L Waite; Charles M Roth
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2012

Review 9.  Nanovehicular intracellular delivery systems.

Authors:  Ales Prokop; Jeffrey M Davidson
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.534

10.  Increased nanoparticle penetration in collagenase-treated multicellular spheroids.

Authors:  Thomas T Goodman; Peggy L Olive; Suzie H Pun
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.