David Richardson1, Steve Wing, Kyle Steenland, Wendy McKelvey. 1. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. david_richardson@unc.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: Health is important for continued employment and therefore continued accrual of occupational exposure; furthermore, steady employment can benefit health. Consequently, bias can occur in estimates of cumulative exposure-mortality associations. This has been called the healthy worker survivor effect (HWSE). The processes associated with the HWSE tend to lead to variation in mortality rates with time-since-termination of employment, most notably a peak in mortality shortly after termination of employment. We use simulations and an empirical example to demonstrate that time-since-termination can be a confounding factor in analyses of occupational-exposure-mortality associations. METHODS: Simulation data were generated for 20,000 workers followed for 40 years under a model of no effect of employment duration (a proxy for cumulative exposure) on mortality. Proportional hazards regression methods were used to quantify exposure-mortality associations and evaluate methods to control for the HWSE. Results were derived after 100 iterations of the simulation. Relationships between employment duration and mortality were also investigated in a cohort of 122,247 male utility workers with adjustments for time since termination. RESULTS: Simulation data show a peak in mortality rates in the first year after termination of employment which declined in magnitude with continued time since termination of employment; average employment duration also declined with time since termination of employment. This led to confounding of cumulative-exposure-mortality associations, with spurious evidence of a positive association between cumulative exposure and mortality in the post-termination period. Adjustment for time-since-termination eliminated this spurious association; in contrast, adjustment for a binary indicator of employment status led to positively-biased relative rate estimates. A similar pattern was observed in analyses of utility worker data. The log relative rate of all cancer mortality is -0.12+/-0.03 per decade of employment without adjustment for time-since-termination, and -0.01+/-0.03 with adjustment for time-since-termination of employment. CONCLUSIONS: The HWSE can lead to temporal variation in mortality rates that is correlated with cumulative exposure. Under these conditions, adjusting for time-since-termination of employment may reduce bias in estimates of cumulative-exposure-mortality trends more effectively than the commonly-used method of adjusting for a binary indicator of employment status.
PURPOSE: Health is important for continued employment and therefore continued accrual of occupational exposure; furthermore, steady employment can benefit health. Consequently, bias can occur in estimates of cumulative exposure-mortality associations. This has been called the healthy worker survivor effect (HWSE). The processes associated with the HWSE tend to lead to variation in mortality rates with time-since-termination of employment, most notably a peak in mortality shortly after termination of employment. We use simulations and an empirical example to demonstrate that time-since-termination can be a confounding factor in analyses of occupational-exposure-mortality associations. METHODS: Simulation data were generated for 20,000 workers followed for 40 years under a model of no effect of employment duration (a proxy for cumulative exposure) on mortality. Proportional hazards regression methods were used to quantify exposure-mortality associations and evaluate methods to control for the HWSE. Results were derived after 100 iterations of the simulation. Relationships between employment duration and mortality were also investigated in a cohort of 122,247 male utility workers with adjustments for time since termination. RESULTS: Simulation data show a peak in mortality rates in the first year after termination of employment which declined in magnitude with continued time since termination of employment; average employment duration also declined with time since termination of employment. This led to confounding of cumulative-exposure-mortality associations, with spurious evidence of a positive association between cumulative exposure and mortality in the post-termination period. Adjustment for time-since-termination eliminated this spurious association; in contrast, adjustment for a binary indicator of employment status led to positively-biased relative rate estimates. A similar pattern was observed in analyses of utility worker data. The log relative rate of all cancer mortality is -0.12+/-0.03 per decade of employment without adjustment for time-since-termination, and -0.01+/-0.03 with adjustment for time-since-termination of employment. CONCLUSIONS: The HWSE can lead to temporal variation in mortality rates that is correlated with cumulative exposure. Under these conditions, adjusting for time-since-termination of employment may reduce bias in estimates of cumulative-exposure-mortality trends more effectively than the commonly-used method of adjusting for a binary indicator of employment status.
Authors: Daniel M Brown; Sally Picciotto; Sadie Costello; Andreas M Neophytou; Monika A Izano; Jacqueline M Ferguson; Ellen A Eisen Journal: Curr Environ Health Rep Date: 2017-09
Authors: Jill F Lebov; Lawrence S Engel; David Richardson; Susan L Hogan; Jane A Hoppin; Dale P Sandler Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Evelyn P Davila; Sharon L Christ; Alberto J Caban-Martinez; David J Lee; Kristopher L Arheart; William G LeBlanc; Kathryn E McCollister; Tainya Clarke; Frederick Zimmerman; Elizabeth Goodman; Carles Muntaner; Lora E Fleming Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Sharia M Ahmed; Brie N Noble; Sakila Afroz Joya; M Omar Sharif Ibn Hasan; Pi-I Lin; Mohammad L Rahman; Golam Mostofa; Quazi Quamruzzaman; Mahmudur Rahman; David C Christiani; Molly L Kile Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Andrew Rundle; John Richie; Karen Steindorf; Marco Peluso; Kim Overvad; Ole Raaschou-Nielsen; Francoise Clavel-Chapelon; Jacob P Linseisen; Heiner Boeing; Antonia Trichopoulou; Domenico Palli; Vittorio Krogh; Rosario Tumino; Salvatore Panico; Hendrik B Bueno-De-Mesquita; Petra H Peeters; Eiliv Lund; Carlos A Gonzalez; Carmen Martinez; Miren Dorronsoro; Aurelio Barricarte; M Jose Tormo; Josèr Quiros; Antonio Agudo; Goran Berglund; Bengt Jarvholm; Sheila Bingham; Timothy J Key; Emmanuelle Gormally; Rodolfo Saracci; Rudolf Kaaks; Elio Riboli; Paolo Vineis Journal: Biomarkers Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 2.658
Authors: Andreas M Neophytou; Sally Picciotto; Jaime E Hart; Eric Garshick; Ellen A Eisen; Francine Laden Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2014-04-12 Impact factor: 4.402