Literature DB >> 18516224

Testing the embryo, testing the fetus.

K Ehrich1, B Farsides, C Williams, Rosamund Scott.   

Abstract

This paper stems from an ethnographic, multidisciplinary study that explored the views and experiences of practitioners and scientists on social, ethical and clinical dilemmas encountered when working in the area of PGD for serious genetic disorders. We focus here on staff perceptions and experiences of working with embryos and helping women/couples to make choices that will result in selecting embryos for transfer and disposal of 'affected' embryos, compared to the termination of affected pregnancies following PND. Analysis and discussion of our data led us to consider the possible advantages of PGD and whether a gradualist account of the embryo's and fetus's moral status can account for all of these, particularly since a gradualist account concentrates on the significance of time (developmental stage) and makes no comment as to the significance of place (in-vitro, in-utero).

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 18516224      PMCID: PMC2312333          DOI: 10.1258/147775007783560139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ethics        ISSN: 1477-7509


  22 in total

1.  Reproductive autonomous choice--a cherished illusion? Reproductive autonomy examined in the context of preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Kristin Zeiler
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2004

2.  Social welfare, genetic welfare? Boundary-work in the IVF/PGD clinic.

Authors:  Kathryn Ehrich; Clare Williams; Rosamund Scott; Jane Sandall; Bobbie Farsides
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Embryonic potential and stem cells.

Authors:  Nicholas Agar
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.898

4.  PGD patients' and providers' attitudes to the use and regulation of preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Andrea L Kalfoglou; Joan Scott; Kathy Hudson
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.828

5.  Women as moral pioneers? Experiences of first trimester antenatal screening.

Authors:  Clare Williams; Jane Sandall; Gillian Lewando-Hundt; Bob Heyman; Kevin Spencer; Rachel Grellier
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 6.  Experiencing new forms of genetic choice: findings from an ethnographic study of preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Celia Roberts; Sarah Franklin
Journal:  Hum Fertil (Camb)       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.767

7.  Preimplantation diagnosis and other reproductive options: attitudes of male and female carriers of recessive disorders.

Authors:  C Snowdon; J M Green
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: patients' experiences and attitudes.

Authors:  S A Lavery; R Aurell; C Turner; C Castello; A Veiga; P N Barri; R M Winston
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Aiming towards "moral equilibrium": health care professionals' views on working within the morally contested field of antenatal screening.

Authors:  B Farsides; C Williams; P Alderson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Choosing embryos: ethical complexity and relational autonomy in staff accounts of PGD.

Authors:  Kathryn Ehrich; Clare Williams; Bobbie Farsides; Jane Sandall; Rosamund Scott
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2007-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.