RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: Ex vivo testing is necessary to characterize implants to determine if it is safe for the patient to undergo a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate MR safety for an implantable microstimulator in association with a 1.5 Tesla MR system. METHODS: A microstimulator (RF BION, Alfred E. Mann Foundation for Scientific Research, Valencia, CA) was evaluated for magnetic field interactions and MRI-related heating. The functional aspects of this implant were assessed immediately before and after exposure to MRI (15 different pulse sequences). Artifacts were also characterized. RESULTS: Magnetic field interactions exhibited by the microstimulator will not pose a hazard after a suitable postimplantation period has elapsed. Temperature changes will not pose a risk. The function of the microstimulator was unaffected by MRI. Artifacts will only create a problem if the area of interest is in proximity to this implant (largest artifact area: T1-weighted spin echo, 2291 mm2; gradient echo, 3310 mm2). CONCLUSION: The overall findings indicated that it is safe for a patient with the microstimulator to undergo MRI at 1.5 Tesla by following specific safety guidelines described herein.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: Ex vivo testing is necessary to characterize implants to determine if it is safe for the patient to undergo a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate MR safety for an implantable microstimulator in association with a 1.5 Tesla MR system. METHODS: A microstimulator (RF BION, Alfred E. Mann Foundation for Scientific Research, Valencia, CA) was evaluated for magnetic field interactions and MRI-related heating. The functional aspects of this implant were assessed immediately before and after exposure to MRI (15 different pulse sequences). Artifacts were also characterized. RESULTS: Magnetic field interactions exhibited by the microstimulator will not pose a hazard after a suitable postimplantation period has elapsed. Temperature changes will not pose a risk. The function of the microstimulator was unaffected by MRI. Artifacts will only create a problem if the area of interest is in proximity to this implant (largest artifact area: T1-weighted spin echo, 2291 mm2; gradient echo, 3310 mm2). CONCLUSION: The overall findings indicated that it is safe for a patient with the microstimulator to undergo MRI at 1.5 Tesla by following specific safety guidelines described herein.
Authors: Alexander Pfeil; Stefanie Drobnik; Reinhard Rzanny; Anas Aboud; Joachim Böttcher; Peter Schmidt; Christian Ortmann; Gita Mall; Khosro Hekmat; Bernhard Brehm; Juergen Reichenbach; Thomas E Mayer; Gunter Wolf; Andreas Hansch Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-02-24 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Zhanghao Yu; Joshua C Chen; Fatima T Alrashdan; Benjamin W Avants; Yan He; Amanda Singer; Jacob T Robinson; Kaiyuan Yang Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst Date: 2020-12-31 Impact factor: 3.833