Literature DB >> 15370571

Early percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy nutrition in head and neck cancer patients.

Kimmo Hujala1, Jukka Sipilä, Jaakko Pulkkinen, Reidar Grenman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Many head and neck cancer patients suffer from poor nutrition. Nutrition is a problem during and after therapy, especially when it consists of extensive surgery, intensive (chemo)radiotherapy or their combination. Additional enteral nutrition has been provided by means of either nasogastric tube feeding, surgical gastrostomy, radiologic percutaneous gastrostomy or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). Because of the straightforward, easy technique involved and its low complication rate, PEG has become established as the primary route of nutrition in these patients. Previously, the aim of assisted enteral nutrition was to compensate for already existing malnutrition; nowadays, an additional purpose is to diminish or prevent the development of malnutrition. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of pre-treatment PEG in a sample of patients with an upper aerodigestive tract area malignancy treated in a tertiary referral centre.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 79 patients with an upper aerodigestive tract area malignancy were treated with a total of 80 PEGs during the period 1997-2001.
RESULTS: Most of the PEGs (62/80; 77.5%) were performed by an otolaryngologist. An open gastrostomy was needed in five cases because of unsuccessful gastroscopy due to oesophageal stricture (n=4) or severe trismus (n=1). Both acute and late complications were minor and the respective complication rates (1/80; 1.3% and 12/80; 15%) were low. In addition, all complications were easily managed and did not seriously affect the actual treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: A major advantage of having the PEG performed by the otorhinolaryngologist was the possibility to combine it easily with other necessary procedures, such as panendoscopy, tracheostomy and additional biopsy. In addition, the timing of the procedure was easy to schedule.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15370571     DOI: 10.1080/00016480410017440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  8 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus percutaneous radiological gastrostomy for swallowing disturbances.

Authors:  Yong Yuan; Yongfan Zhao; Tianpeng Xie; Yang Hu
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-03

2.  Indications, complications and long-term follow-up of patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Fatih Ermis; Melih Ozel; Kemal Oncu; Yusuf Yazgan; Levent Demirturk; Ahmet Kemal Gurbuz; Taner Akyol; Hasan Nazik
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  Prospective experience of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes placed by otorhinolaryngologist-head and neck surgeons: safe and efficacious.

Authors:  Johanna Ruohoalho; Katri Aro; Antti A Mäkitie; Timo Atula; Aaro Haapaniemi; Harri Keski-Säntti; Leena Kylänpää; Annika Takala; Leif J Bäck
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in head and neck cancer patients: results of tertiary institute.

Authors:  Jaakko Pulkkinen; Jami Rekola; Mari Asanti; Reidar Grénman
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Prophylactic feeding tubes for patients with locally advanced head-and-neck cancer undergoing combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy-systematic review and recommendations for clinical practice.

Authors:  C Orphanidou; K Biggs; M E Johnston; J R Wright; A Bowman; S J Hotte; A Esau; C Myers; V Blunt; M Lafleur; B Sheehan; M A Griffin
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Gastrostomy tube placement by radiological versus endoscopic methods in an acute care setting: a retrospective review of frequency, indications, complications and outcomes.

Authors:  Amy Galaski; Wei Wei Peng; Michelle Ellis; Pauline Darling; Andrew Common; Emma Tucker
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 7.  Usefulness of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for supportive therapy of advanced aerodigestive cancer.

Authors:  Haruei Ogino; Hirotada Akiho
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2013-11-15

8.  Gastrostomy Tube Placement by Radiological Methods for Older Patients Requiring Enteral Nutrition: Not to be Forgotten.

Authors:  Vered Hermush; Yitshal Berner; Yael Katz; Yanina Kunin; Irena Krasniansky; Yael Schwartz; Debbie Mimran Nahon; Ana Elizariev; Gad Mendelson
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-09-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.