Literature DB >> 22382552

Indications, complications and long-term follow-up of patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: A retrospective study.

Fatih Ermis1, Melih Ozel, Kemal Oncu, Yusuf Yazgan, Levent Demirturk, Ahmet Kemal Gurbuz, Taner Akyol, Hasan Nazik.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Gastroenterology units have faced a major increase in referrals for PEG insertion over the last decade. For this reason we decided to review our PEG insertion procedures with regard to indications, complications and follow-up.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The indications, success of procedure, complications, long-term results of PEG in patients of Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Haydarpasa Training Hospital between October 2002 and April 2009 were retrospectively evaluated.
RESULTS: 81 patients had undergone PEG insertion and follow-up information has been available for 77 patients. 40 were men with the mean age of all patients 70.74 ± 20.82 (range 20 to 104 years). PEG was successfully placed in all patients except in one patient who had gastric bleeding during the procedure. There was only one mortality related with the placement procedure. The most common indication for PEG was neurologic disorders in 71 (92%) patients. Other indications were head and neck cancers in 6 (8%) patients. Median follow-up period was 12 months (range, 3 days to 78 months). PEG related complications were seen in only 14 patients (18.2%) in 16 events with a total complication rate as 21%.
CONCLUSIONS: PEG placement is a safe procedure and well-tolerated with a low mortality and complication rate even in older patients who have multiple co-morbidities under adequate precautions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22382552     DOI: 10.1007/s00508-011-0082-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5325            Impact factor:   1.704


  47 in total

1.  Antibiotic prophylaxis in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  L Gossner; J Keymling; E G Hahn; C Ell
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Antibiotic prophylaxis in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  T M Sturgis; W Yancy; J C Cole; D D Proctor; B S Minhas; S P Marcuard
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 3.  Ethical and medicolegal aspects of PEG-tube placement and provision of artificial nutritional therapy.

Authors:  Mark H DeLegge; Stephen A McClave; James A DiSario; William N Baskin; Russel D Brown; John C Fang; Gregory G Ginsberg
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  PEG and RIG tube feeding in Head and Neck patients: a retrospective review of complications and outcome.

Authors:  N Eze; J M Jefford; D Wolf; P Williamson; P Neild
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 5.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  B Y Safadi; J M Marks; J L Ponsky
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  1998-07

6.  The efficacy and limitations of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  W R Jarnagin; Q Y Duh; S J Mulvihill; J A Ridge; T R Schrock; L W Way
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1992-03

7.  The role of screening and antibiotic prophylaxis in the prevention of percutaneous gastrostomy site infection caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  S Thomas; S Cantrill; D J Waghorn; A McIntyre
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 8.171

8.  Predicting the need for prolonged enteral supplementation in the patient with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  R L Gardine; W A Kokal; J D Beatty; D U Riihimaki; L D Wagman; J J Terz
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Initial placement by single endoscopic technique and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  J P Grant
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) for enteral nutrition in patients with stroke.

Authors:  L Ha; T Hauge
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.423

View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparison of clinical outcomes associated with pull-type and introducer-type percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies.

Authors:  Sin Won Lee; Jeong Hoon Lee; Hyungjin Cho; Yeonjung Ha; Hyun Lim; Ji Yong Ahn; Kwi Sook Choi; Do Hoon Kim; Kee Don Choi; Ho June Song; Gin Hyug Lee; Hwoon-Yong Jung; Jin-Ho Kim
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2014-11-30

2.  Comparison of 231 patients receiving either "pull-through" or "push" percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Gernot Köhler; Veronika Kalcher; Oliver O Koch; Ruzica-R Luketina; Klaus Emmanuel; Georg Spaun
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Single endoscopist-performed percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement.

Authors:  Askin Erdogan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Risk factors for complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Sang Pyo Lee; Kang Nyeong Lee; Oh Young Lee; Hang Lak Lee; Dae Won Jun; Byung Chul Yoon; Ho Soon Choi; Seung Hyun Kim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Prediction of risk of adverse events related to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Maha Osman Mohamed Shangab; Niaz Ahmed Shaikh
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-07-25

6.  Outcomes of push and pull percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placements in 854 patients: A single-center study.

Authors:  Hicham Bouchiba; Maarten A J M Jacobs; Gerd Bouma; Dewkoemar Ramsoekh
Journal:  JGH Open       Date:  2021-12-08

7.  Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in hospitalized patients at a tertiary care center in Turkey.

Authors:  K Gundogan; A Yurci; R Coskun; M Baskol; S Gursoy; G Hebbar; M Sungur; T R Ziegler
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  An Unusual Cause of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in a Patient with Enteral Feeding.

Authors:  Ömer Öztürk; Evrim Kahramanoglu Aksoy; Yagmur Can Dadakci; Ömer Basar
Journal:  Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.