Literature DB >> 15366737

Improved prognosis of resected esophageal cancer.

Hubert J Stein, Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert.   

Abstract

Because of the perceived high risk of esophagectomy and the assumed poor long-term results, the role of surgical resection as the mainstay of treatment for localized esophageal cancer is currently being challenged. Early tumors are increasingly approached by endoscopic mucosectomy or mucosal ablation techniques, whereas combined radiochemotherapy without surgery has become the treatment of choice for locally advanced tumors at many institutions. Several recent reports and our experience, however, indicate that surgical resection of esophageal cancer has become a safe procedure and long-term survival rates after surgical resection have improved markedly during the past two decades. A number of factors have been associated with the marked reduction in postoperative mortality and improved long-term survival after surgical resection. They include changes in the epidemiology with an increased rate of adenocarcinoma mostly located distally, patient selection for surgery, improvements in surgical technique and perioperative management, and the use of neoadjuvant treatment protocols. The treatment strategy and extent of the surgical procedure can now be tailored based on histologic tumor type, tumor location, tumor stage, and the general condition of the patient. With an individualized approach, surgical resection of esophageal cancer can predictably offer cure. Surgical resection thus remains the major pillar in the successful treatment of esophageal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15366737     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-004-7417-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  34 in total

1.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Sentinel lymph nodes with technetium-99m colloidal rhenium sulfide in patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kato; Tatsuya Miyazaki; Masanobu Nakajima; Junko Takita; Makoto Sohda; Yasuyuki Fukai; Norihiro Masuda; Minoru Fukuchi; Ryokuhei Manda; Hitoshi Ojima; Katsuhiko Tsukada; Takayuki Asao; Hiroyuki Kuwano; Noboru Oriuchi; Keigo Endo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Three-field lymphadenectomy and pattern of lymph node spread in T3 adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and the gastro-esophageal junction.

Authors:  C van de Ven; P De Leyn; W Coosemans; D Van Raemdonck; T Lerut
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  Esophagogastrectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and cardia: a comparison of findings and results after standard resection in three consecutive eight-year intervals with improved staging criteria.

Authors:  F H Ellis; G J Heatley; M J Krasna; W A Williamson; K Balogh
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  A comparison of multimodal therapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  T N Walsh; N Noonan; D Hollywood; A Kelly; N Keeling; T P Hennessy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Limited resection for early adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  H J Stein; M Feith; J Mueller; M Werner; J R Siewert
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Combined modality radiotherapy and chemotherapy in nonsurgical management of localized carcinoma of the esophagus: a practice guideline.

Authors:  Rebecca K S Wong; Richard A Malthaner; Lisa Zuraw; R Bryan Rumble
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Postesophagectomy morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay after preoperative chemoradiation therapy.

Authors:  John R Doty; Jorge D Salazar; Arlene A Forastiere; Elisabeth I Heath; Lawrence Kleinberg; Richard F Heitmiller
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Miguel Alvelo-Rivera; Percival O Buenaventura; Neil A Christie; James S McCaughan; Virginia R Litle; Philip R Schauer; John M Close; Hiran C Fernando
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Preoperative risk analysis and postoperative mortality of oesophagectomy for resectable oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  H Bartels; H J Stein; J R Siewert
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  27 in total

1.  [Neoadjuvant therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus].

Authors:  F Lordick
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Lymph nodes are important.

Authors:  Paul Schipper
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy: meta-analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  George Sgourakis; Ines Gockel; Arnold Radtke; Thomas J Musholt; Stephan Timm; Andreas Rink; Achilleas Tsiamis; Constantine Karaliotas; Hauke Lang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Prognostic significance of RCAS1 expression in relation to the infiltration of dendritic cells and lymphocytes in patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Shunichi Tsujitani; Hiroaki Saito; Shinichi Oka; Teruhisa Sakamoto; Shingo Kanaji; Shigeru Tatebe; Masahide Ikeguchi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Bernard M Smithers; David C Gotley; Ian Martin; Janine M Thomas
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Survival after oesophagectomy for cancer of the oesophagus.

Authors:  Hubert J Stein; Burkhard H A von Rahden; J Rüdiger Siewert
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-07-14       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Clinicopathologic characteristics of esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma in elderly patients.

Authors:  Jian-Yang Ma; Zhu Wu; Yun Wang; Yong-Fan Zhao; Lun-Xu Liu; Ying-Li Kou; Qing-Hua Zhou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Extended esophagectomy in elderly patients with esophageal cancer: minor effect of age alone in determining the postoperative course and survival.

Authors:  B B Pultrum; D J Bosch; M W N Nijsten; M G G Rodgers; H Groen; J P J Slaets; J Th M Plukker
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy in the elderly.

Authors:  Shailesh Puntambekar; Rahul Kenawadekar; Archit Pandit; Akshay Nadkarni; Saurabh Joshi; Geetanjali Agarwal; Nasir Ahmad Bhat; Jainul Malik; Sunil Reddy
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-08-24

10.  Nurse-led follow-up of patients after oesophageal or gastric cardia cancer surgery: a randomised trial.

Authors:  E M L Verschuur; E W Steyerberg; H W Tilanus; S Polinder; M-L Essink-Bot; K T C Tran; A van der Gaast; L P S Stassen; E J Kuipers; P D Siersema
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.