Literature DB >> 15348132

The failure of amalgam dental restorations due to cyclic fatigue crack growth.

D Arola1, M P Huang, M B Sultan.   

Abstract

In this study a restored mandibular molar with different Class II amalgam preparations was examined to analyze the potential for restoration failure attributed to cyclic fatigue crack growth. A finite element analysis was used to determine the stress distribution along the cavo-surface margin which results from occlusal loading of each restoration. The cyclic crack growth rate of sub-surface flaws located along the dentinal cavo-surface margin were determined utilizing the Paris law. Based on similarities in material properties and lack of fatigue property data for dental biomaterials, the cyclic fatigue crack growth parameters for engineering ceramics were used to approximate the crack growth behavior. It was found that flaws located within the dentine along the buccal and lingual margins can significantly reduce the fatigue life of restored teeth. Sub-surface cracks as short as 25 microm were found capable of promoting tooth fracture well within 25 years from the time of restoration. Furthermore, cracks longer than 100 microm reduced the fatigue life to less than 5 years. Consequently, sub-surface cracks introduced during cavity preparation with conventional dental burrs may serve as a principal source for premature restoration failure. Copyright 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 15348132     DOI: 10.1023/a:1026435821960

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  16 in total

1.  The application of real-time confocal microscopy to the study of high-speed dental-bur-tooth-cutting interactions.

Authors:  T F Watson
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 1.758

Review 2.  Masticatory function-a review of the literature: (II) Speed of movement of the mandible, rate of chewing and forces developed in chewing.

Authors:  J F Bates; G D Stafford; A Harrison
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 3.837

Review 3.  Bite force and chewing efficiency.

Authors:  G E Carlsson
Journal:  Front Oral Physiol       Date:  1974

4.  Assessment by nano-indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area.

Authors:  B Van Meerbeek; G Willems; J P Celis; J R Roos; M Braem; P Lambrechts; G Vanherle
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 6.116

5.  Selected restoration and tooth conditions: United States, 1988-1991.

Authors:  B A White; T F Albertini; L J Brown; D Larach-Robinson; M Redford; R H Selwitz
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.116

6.  Cross-sectional clinical evaluation of recurrent enamel caries, restoration of marginal integrity, and oral hygiene status.

Authors:  J Goldberg; J Tanzer; E Munster; J Amara; F Thal; D Birkhed
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 3.634

7.  A confocal microscopic study of some factors affecting the adaptation of a light-cured glass ionomer to tooth tissue.

Authors:  T F Watson
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 6.116

8.  A simple model of crack propagation in dental restorations.

Authors:  R L Sakaguchi; M Cross; W H Douglas
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.304

9.  Fracture toughness of human dentin.

Authors:  O M El Mowafy; D C Watts
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 6.116

10.  Fracture toughness of dentin/resin-composite adhesive interfaces.

Authors:  L E Tam; R M Pilliar
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 6.116

View more
  12 in total

1.  Degradation in the fatigue strength of dentin by cutting, etching and adhesive bonding.

Authors:  H H Lee; H Majd; S Orrego; B Majd; E Romberg; M M Mutluay; D Arola
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  Degradation in the fatigue crack growth resistance of human dentin by lactic acid.

Authors:  Santiago Orrego; Huakun Xu; Dwayne Arola
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 7.328

3.  Degradation in the fatigue resistance of dentin by bur and abrasive air-jet preparations.

Authors:  H Majd; J Viray; J A Porter; E Romberg; D Arola
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  The reduction in fatigue crack growth resistance of dentin with depth.

Authors:  J Ivancik; N K Neerchal; E Romberg; D Arola
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 6.116

5.  Contributions of microstructure and chemical composition to the mechanical properties of dentin.

Authors:  H Ryou; N Amin; A Ross; N Eidelman; D H Wang; E Romberg; D Arola
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Degradation in the fatigue strength of dentin by diamond bur preparations: Importance of cutting direction.

Authors:  B Majd; H Majd; J A Porter; E Romberg; D Arola
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 3.368

7.  Durability of self-healing dental composites: A comparison of performance under monotonic and cyclic loading.

Authors:  Mobin Yahyazadehfar; George Huyang; Xiaohong Wang; Yuwei Fan; Dwayne Arola; Jirun Sun
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 7.328

8.  Differences in the microstructure and fatigue properties of dentine between residents of North and South America.

Authors:  J Ivancik; M Naranjo; S Correa; A Ossa; F R Tay; D H Pashley; D Arola
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 2.633

Review 9.  The Tooth: Its Structure and Properties.

Authors:  Dwayne D Arola; Shanshan Gao; Hai Zhang; Radi Masri
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2017-10

10.  The importance of microstructural variations on the fracture toughness of human dentin.

Authors:  Juliana Ivancik; Dwayne D Arola
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-11-03       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.